Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Position-effect Variegation02:32

Position-effect Variegation

In 1928, a German botanist Emil Heitz observed the moss nuclei with a DNA binding dye. He observed that while some chromatin regions decondense and spread out in the interphase nucleus, others do not. He termed them euchromatin and heterochromatin, respectively. He proposed that the heterochromatin regions reflect a functionally inactive state of the genome. It was later confirmed that heterochromatin is transcriptionally repressed, and euchromatin is transcriptionally active chromatin.
Combinatorial Gene Control02:33

Combinatorial Gene Control

Combinatorial gene control is the synergistic action of several transcriptional factors to regulate the expression of a single gene. The absence of one or more of these factors may lead to a significant difference in the level of gene expression or repression.
The expression of more than 30,000 genes is controlled by approximately 2000-3000 transcription factors. This is possible because a single transcription factor can recognize more than one regulatory sequence. The specificity in gene...
Master Transcription Regulators02:23

Master Transcription Regulators

Master transcription regulators are regulatory proteins that are predominantly responsible for regulating the expression of multiple genes. Often these genes work in concert to drive a  complex process. Activation of a master transcription regulator can lead to a cascade of transcriptional activation necessary for that outcome. These regulators can directly bind to the regulatory sequences of the various genes involved, or they can indirectly regulate transcription by binding to regulatory...
Cis-regulatory Sequences02:02

Cis-regulatory Sequences

Cis-regulatory sequences are short fragments of non-coding DNA that are present on the same chromosomes as the genes that they regulate. These fragments serve as binding sites for transcriptional regulators, proteins that are responsible for controlling gene transcription and differential gene expression across cell types in eukaryotes. Cis-regulatory sequences can be close to the gene of interest or thousands of bases away in the DNA sequence; however, those sequences that are further away are...
Cis-regulatory Sequences02:02

Cis-regulatory Sequences

Cis-regulatory sequences are short fragments of non-coding DNA that are present on the same chromosomes as the genes that they regulate. These fragments serve as binding sites for transcriptional regulators, proteins that are responsible for controlling gene transcription and differential gene expression across cell types in eukaryotes. Cis-regulatory sequences can be close to the gene of interest or thousands of bases away in the DNA sequence; however, those sequences that are further away are...
General Transcription Factors01:30

General Transcription Factors

Tissue-specific transcription factors contribute to diverse cellular functions in mammals. For example, the gene for beta globin, a major component of hemoglobin, is present in all cells of the body. However, it is only expressed in red blood cells because the transcription factors that can bind to the promoter sequences of the beta globin gene are only expressed in these cells. Tissue-specific transcription factors also ensure that mutations in these factors may impair only the function of...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Promoter competition and Polycomb response elements govern transvection efficiency between co-regulated engrailed and invected genes in Drosophila.

Genetics·2025
Same author

Polycomb protein binding and looping in the ON transcriptional state.

Science advances·2024
Same author

Polycomb protein binding and looping mediated by Polycomb Response Elements in the ON transcriptional state.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2023
Same author

The activity of engrailed imaginal disc enhancers is modulated epigenetically by chromatin and autoregulation.

PLoS genetics·2023
Same author

The activity of <i>engrailed</i> imaginal disc enhancers is modulated epigenetically by chromatin and autoregulation.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2023
Same author

Context-dependent role of Pho binding sites in Polycomb complex recruitment in Drosophila.

Genetics·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 14, 2026

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) using Drosophila tissue
13:47

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) using Drosophila tissue

Published on: March 23, 2012

Polycomb group response elements in Drosophila and vertebrates.

Judith A Kassis1, J Lesley Brown

  • 1Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. jkassis@mail.nih.gov

Advances in Genetics
|February 20, 2013
PubMed
Summary

Polycomb group (PcG) proteins are epigenetic regulators that repress gene transcription. This review explores Polycomb group response elements (PREs) in Drosophila and vertebrates, examining how PcG proteins are recruited to DNA.

More Related Videos

Quantitative Comparison of cis-Regulatory Element (CRE) Activities in Transgenic Drosophila melanogaster
08:19

Quantitative Comparison of cis-Regulatory Element (CRE) Activities in Transgenic Drosophila melanogaster

Published on: December 19, 2011

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 14, 2026

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) using Drosophila tissue
13:47

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) using Drosophila tissue

Published on: March 23, 2012

Quantitative Comparison of cis-Regulatory Element (CRE) Activities in Transgenic Drosophila melanogaster
08:19

Quantitative Comparison of cis-Regulatory Element (CRE) Activities in Transgenic Drosophila melanogaster

Published on: December 19, 2011

Area of Science:

  • Developmental Biology
  • Epigenetics
  • Molecular Biology

Background:

  • Polycomb group (PcG) proteins are conserved epigenetic regulators essential for development.
  • In Drosophila, PcG proteins repress homeotic genes via Polycomb group response elements (PREs).
  • PcG proteins function in complexes and are not DNA-binding themselves.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the evidence for PREs in vertebrates.
  • To compare and contrast Drosophila and vertebrate PREs.
  • To understand the mechanisms of PcG protein recruitment to DNA.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of studies on PcG proteins and PREs.
  • Comparative analysis of PRE function in Drosophila and vertebrates.
  • Discussion of functional PRE assays in transgenes.

Main Results:

  • Drosophila PREs are complex DNA elements that recruit PcG complexes.
  • PRE activity is context-dependent and influenced by other regulatory DNA.
  • Vertebrates show diverse PcG recruitment mechanisms, including RNA-mediated pathways.

Conclusions:

  • PREs are crucial for PcG-mediated gene repression in both Drosophila and vertebrates.
  • Differences exist in PRE structure and PcG recruitment mechanisms between species.
  • Further research is needed to fully elucidate vertebrate PRE function.