Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Is long distance lithotripsy effective?

A W Ritchie1, G J Neerhut, D A Tolley

  • 1Scottish Lithotriptor Centre, Deaconess Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.

Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh
|February 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Do natural killer cells regulate B-cell activity?

Immunology today·2014
Same author

Matched pair analysis of laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy for the treatment of T3 renal cell carcinoma.

World journal of urology·2014
Same author

Fatal case of sorafenib-associated idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity in the adjuvant treatment of a patient with renal cell carcinoma.

BMC cancer·2012
Same author

The use of extra-corporeal shockwave lithotripsy for obstructing ureteric stones.

Minerva urologica e nefrologica = The Italian journal of urology and nephrology·2011
Same author

Housing; its effects on the nation's health.

Nursing times·2010
Same author

The management of ureteric stones.

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England·2010

Patients undergoing lithotripsy near the treatment site had similar outcomes and complication rates as those traveling longer distances. Long-distance lithotripsy offers no disadvantage for stone-free rates and morbidity.

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Nephrology

Background:

  • Lithotripsy is a common procedure for kidney stone treatment.
  • Patient proximity to lithotripsy equipment may influence treatment outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the outcomes and morbidity of patients treated with lithotripsy based on their proximity to the lithotriptor.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective comparison of 132 patients living near a lithotriptor versus 251 patients living farther away.
  • Analysis of stone-free rates and complication incidence.
  • Follow-up duration was a key consideration in outcome assessment.

Main Results:

  • Short-term follow-up showed a higher stone-free rate for patients near the lithotriptor, but this difference disappeared with longer follow-up (minimum 10 days).

Related Experiment Videos

  • No significant difference in complication rates (18% vs. 19%) between the groups.
  • Stone burden affected outcomes similarly in both groups.

    • Conclusions:

    • Proximity to a lithotriptor does not offer a significant advantage in terms of stone-free rates or complication incidence.
    • Long-distance travel for lithotripsy is a viable option with comparable outcomes, despite potential inconvenience.