Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Association Areas of the Cortex01:21

Association Areas of the Cortex

Association areas are regions of the cerebral cortex that do not have a specific sensory or motor function. Instead, they integrate and interpret information from various sources to enable higher cognitive processes such as memory, learning, and decision-making. Some key association areas include the following:
Prefrontal Association Area: This area is located in the frontal lobe and is involved in planning, decision-making, and moderating social behavior. It connects with primary motor areas,...
Facial Feedback Hypothesis01:24

Facial Feedback Hypothesis

Charles Darwin proposed that facial expressions are an evolutionary adaptation for communication. He argued that these expressions are not influenced by culture but are universal across species. For example, a snarling expression with exposed teeth signals a threat in many animals, including humans. Darwin also suggested that displaying an emotion can intensify the feeling. Smiling, for example, could enhance one's sense of happiness. This idea laid the foundation for understanding the role of...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Training humans to detect AI-generated faces.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Differences between the perception and the recognition of cross-race faces.

Cognition·2026
Same author

The correlation between left atrial appendage morphology and thromboembolic risk in atrial fibrillation.

Frontiers in stroke·2026
Same author

A Machine Learning Approach to Predict Health Care-acquired Urinary Tract Infections From Electronic Nursing Documentation.

Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN·2025
Same author

Attending to faces and bodies in person perception.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2025
Same author

Limited genomic diversity and convergent adaptation of <i>Brucella melitensis</i> isolated from human in East China, from 2011 to 2024.

Frontiers in microbiology·2025
Same journal

Analysis of human visual experience data.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Pyramid-based Bayesian modeling for high-resolution behavioral analysis.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Sensation without perception: The white whale effect and perceptual blindness in autonomous vehicles.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Gaze behavior during closed-captioned movie viewing adapts to absent audio through more frequent switching between text and scene.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

In pursuit of saccade awareness: Limited volitional control and minimal conscious access to catch-up saccades during smooth pursuit eye movements.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Dissociable effects of element-lifetime and stimulus-duration on local and global motion processing: An equivalent noise study.

Journal of vision·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 14, 2026

Analyzing Neural Activity and Connectivity Using Intracranial EEG Data with SPM Software
06:50

Analyzing Neural Activity and Connectivity Using Intracranial EEG Data with SPM Software

Published on: October 30, 2018

Does face inversion qualitatively change face processing: an eye movement study using a face change detection task.

Buyun Xu1, James W Tanaka

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada. xubuyun@uvic.ca

Journal of Vision
|February 20, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Face inversion disrupts visual processing, making change detection harder for inverted faces. Eye movement patterns shift, particularly in the mouth region, indicating a qualitative change in how we see faces upside down.

More Related Videos

Three-Dimensional Mapping of the Rotation of Interactive Virtual Objects with Eye-Tracking Data
06:36

Three-Dimensional Mapping of the Rotation of Interactive Virtual Objects with Eye-Tracking Data

Published on: October 18, 2024

A Method to Quantify Visual Information Processing in Children Using Eye Tracking
09:47

A Method to Quantify Visual Information Processing in Children Using Eye Tracking

Published on: July 9, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 14, 2026

Analyzing Neural Activity and Connectivity Using Intracranial EEG Data with SPM Software
06:50

Analyzing Neural Activity and Connectivity Using Intracranial EEG Data with SPM Software

Published on: October 30, 2018

Three-Dimensional Mapping of the Rotation of Interactive Virtual Objects with Eye-Tracking Data
06:36

Three-Dimensional Mapping of the Rotation of Interactive Virtual Objects with Eye-Tracking Data

Published on: October 18, 2024

A Method to Quantify Visual Information Processing in Children Using Eye Tracking
09:47

A Method to Quantify Visual Information Processing in Children Using Eye Tracking

Published on: July 9, 2016

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • The Face Inversion Effect describes how upside-down faces are harder to recognize than right-side-up faces.
  • Debate exists whether this effect stems from a qualitative change in processing or a quantitative decrease in efficiency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the qualitative versus quantitative debate surrounding the Face Inversion Effect.
  • To examine how eye movements differ during the processing of upright and inverted faces.
  • To analyze the impact of configural and featural information changes on face processing.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a response-contingent, change detection paradigm.
  • Recorded eye movements during the processing of upright and inverted faces.
  • Parametrically and independently manipulated configural (interocular/mouth-nose distance) and featural (eye/mouth size) information.

Main Results:

  • Change detection was significantly more difficult for inverted faces compared to upright faces.
  • Performance declined when changes occurred in the mouth region, despite increased attention to this area.
  • Inverted faces led to more fixations on the nose and mouth, unlike upright faces which focused on eyes and nose.
  • The link between the last fixation location and accuracy was stronger for inverted faces.

Conclusions:

  • Face inversion causes a qualitative disruption in visual search strategies, especially concerning the mouth region.
  • Eye movement patterns provide insights into the distinct processing of upright versus inverted faces.
  • Findings support the notion that face inversion fundamentally alters visual processing strategies.