Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Influence of Cognition on Affect01:29

The Influence of Cognition on Affect

Cognition plays a pivotal role in shaping emotional experiences, as demonstrated by Schachter and Singer’s two-factor theory of emotion. According to this model, emotion arises from a combination of physiological arousal and cognitive interpretation. The body’s physiological response to stimuli is ambiguous and only gains emotional significance through cognitive labeling. For instance, an increased heart rate and adrenaline surge while standing near an attractive person may be interpreted as...
The Influence of Affect on Cognition01:29

The Influence of Affect on Cognition

Positive affect significantly influences cognitive processes, including evaluation, memory, creativity, and social judgments. Compared to negative affect, positive emotional states promote more favorable interpretations of stimuli, cognitive flexibility, and heuristic processing. These effects highlight emotions' powerful role in shaping how individuals perceive, remember, and interact with the world.Influence on Evaluation and AttributionWhen individuals experience positive affect, they are...
Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in different ways based on the...
Traits, Mood, and Subjective Wellbeing01:22

Traits, Mood, and Subjective Wellbeing

Subjective well-being (SWB) refers to an individual's self-evaluation of their overall life satisfaction, happiness, and fulfillment. This multifaceted construct is typically assessed by analyzing the balance of positive and negative emotions alongside perceptions of life satisfaction. Personality traits such as neuroticism and extraversion are strongly associated with variations in SWB, offering critical insights into the underlying mechanisms of emotional well-being.
Neuroticism and Emotional...
Social Relationships and Well-Being01:30

Social Relationships and Well-Being

The significance of social relationships in psychological well-being is a well-established area of inquiry within social psychology. Research consistently demonstrates that the presence of meaningful, supportive relationships enhances emotional health, while the absence or deterioration of such connections can contribute to psychological distress. Relationships serve as a foundation for emotional support, identity, and social belonging, all of which are critical to an individual’s overall...
Factors Affecting Perception01:25

Factors Affecting Perception

Perception is influenced by perceptual set, context, motivation, and emotion. Perceptual set, or perceptual expectancy, refers to the tendency to perceive things in a particular way, influenced by previous experiences and expectations. This phenomenon affects the interpretation of stimuli, creating a set of mental tendencies and assumptions that impact sensory perceptions of sound, taste, touch, and sight.
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Structure and temporal stability of adolescent psychotic experiences: findings from a German longitudinal cohort study.

Psychological medicine·2026
Same author

Modelling non-linear personality change surrounding transitions: A review of statistical approaches.

European journal of personality·2026
Same author

Analyzing the Temporal Structure of Proactive Coping: An Integrative Approach.

Journal of personality·2026
Same author

Eviction, Collective Efficacy, and Firearm Violence in Chicago.

JAMA network open·2026
Same author

Mother infant cortisol levels and maternal childhood adversity.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

A multimetric examination of self-reported personality functioning and personality trait development.

Journal of psychopathology and clinical science·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 14, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Time frames and the distinction between affective and cognitive well-being.

Maike Luhmann1, Louise C Hawkley, Michael Eid

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Chicago, United States.

Journal of Research in Personality
|February 20, 2013
PubMed
Summary

Empirical differences between affective well-being (AWB) and cognitive well-being (CWB) stem from structural variations, not just time frames. Cognitive well-being focuses on global life circumstances, while affective well-being considers specific events.

Keywords:
IncomeLife eventsLife satisfactionMeasurement of subjective well-beingMoodMultitrait-multimethod (MTMM) modelingPersonality

More Related Videos

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
12:55

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Published on: September 27, 2020

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Memory-Enhancing Effect of Emotion
15:57

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Memory-Enhancing Effect of Emotion

Published on: May 4, 2011

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 14, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
12:55

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Published on: September 27, 2020

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Memory-Enhancing Effect of Emotion
15:57

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Memory-Enhancing Effect of Emotion

Published on: May 4, 2011

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Well-being Research

Background:

  • Affective well-being (AWB) and cognitive well-being (CWB) are distinct constructs.
  • Empirical differences between AWB and CWB warrant investigation into their underlying causes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether empirical differences between AWB and CWB are attributable to measurement time frames or structural disparities.
  • To explore the influence of time frames on the measurement of AWB and CWB.

Main Methods:

  • Study 1 employed a multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) analysis to assess the convergence of AWB and CWB components under identical time frames.
  • Study 2 examined how individuals evaluate CWB by considering global life circumstances versus specific events, irrespective of the time frame.

Main Results:

  • MTMM analysis revealed that AWB and CWB components show greater similarity but incomplete convergence when using the same time frame.
  • Individuals evaluating CWB tend to focus on global life circumstances, independent of the time frame considered.
  • Time frame did not moderate the relationship between AWB and CWB and their correlates (personality, life circumstances).

Conclusions:

  • Structural differences, particularly the consideration of global versus specific factors, contribute more significantly to the empirical distinctions between AWB and CWB than time frames alone.
  • Understanding these structural differences is crucial for accurately measuring and differentiating affective and cognitive well-being.