Related Experiment Videos
Concurrent validity of the MacAndrew Alcoholism Scale: mixed-group validation
1Department of Psychology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701.
Journal of Studies on Alcohol
|May 1, 1990
Summary
The MacAndrew Alcoholism Scale (MAC) shows strong concurrent validity for identifying potential alcohol abuse, even with varying base rates. Its effectiveness is comparable to methods using diagnosed alcoholics.
Area of Science:
- Psychological assessment
- Addiction research
- Clinical psychology
Background:
- The MacAndrew Alcoholism Scale (MAC) is a tool used in psychological assessments.
- Assessing the concurrent validity of diagnostic tools is crucial for their reliable application.
- Previous methods for validating alcoholism scales have limitations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the concurrent validity of the MacAndrew Alcoholism Scale (MAC).
- To employ the mixed-group validation procedure for assessing the MAC scale.
- To determine the MAC scale's effectiveness across different population base rates.
Main Methods:
- Utilized the mixed-group validation procedure developed by Dawes and Meehl (1966).
- Formed mixed groups with varying proportions of individuals at risk for alcoholism, based on family history.
- Observed the proportion of subjects exceeding specific MAC cutting scores.
Main Results:
- Validity coefficients ranged from .82 to 1.02 when a MAC cutting score of 24 was applied.
- These coefficients were obtained across different assumed base rates of alcoholism.
- The obtained validity estimates were comparable to those derived from studies using known alcoholics.
Conclusions:
- The MacAndrew Alcoholism Scale (MAC) demonstrates robust concurrent validity.
- The scale's validity is maintained across diverse population base rates.
- The MAC scale is a reliable instrument for identifying potential alcohol abuse.