Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 14, 2026

A Whole Body Dosimetry Protocol for Peptide-Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT): 2D Planar Image and Hybrid 2D+3D SPECT/CT Image Methods
Published on: April 24, 2020
Determination of kidney function with 99mTc-DTPA renography using a dual-head camera
Claus J Madsen1, Michael L Møller, Bo Zerahn
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Herning Regional Hospital, Herning. cljuma01@heh.regionh.dk
Dual-head gamma camera renography offers no significant difference in estimating kidney function compared to single-head methods. This dual-head approach may improve absolute and relative kidney function assessment, especially in patients with varying kidney depths or malformations.
Area of Science:
- Nuclear Medicine
- Renal Physiology
Background:
- Single-head gamma camera renography is a long-standing method for estimating kidney function.
- Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is typically assessed using technetium-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Tc-DTPA).
- Discrepancies in kidney depth or size can introduce errors in single-head renography due to differing attenuation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the accuracy of single-head versus dual-head gamma camera renography in assessing individual kidney function.
- To evaluate the utility of geometric mean data from dual-head renography in reducing errors associated with kidney depth and size variations.
Main Methods:
- Thirty-four patients underwent both single-head and dual-head renography using Tc-DTPA.
- Single kidney GFR was estimated using both methods (GFRcam1 and GFRcam2).
- Results were compared against GFR determined from plasma samples (GFRps).
Main Results:
- No significant difference was found in the prediction intervals between single-head (GFRcam1) and dual-head (GFRcam2) GFR estimates when compared to plasma-based GFR (GFRps).
- The standard deviations of the differences were 17.6 ml/min for GFRcam1-GFRps and 15.5 ml/min for GFRcam2-GFRps.
- Coefficients of variation were 16.5% for single-head and 14.7% for dual-head estimation.
Conclusions:
- The variance in GFR estimation is comparable between single-head and dual-head renography.
- Dual-head camera renography presents potential benefits for daily practice, offering improved assessment of absolute and relative kidney function.
- This method is particularly advantageous for patients with differential kidney depths or malformed kidneys.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
Imaging Studies VII: Vascular Imaging
Imaging Studies V: Intravenous Urography and Retrograde Pyelography
Imaging Studies II: Ultrasonography
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies II: Positron Emission Tomography and Scintigraphy
Fundamental Principles of PET

