Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 14, 2026

Full-root Aortic Valve Replacement by Stentless Aortic Xenografts in Patients with Small Aortic Roots
Published on: May 21, 2017
Coronary artery disease and outcomes of aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis
Jocelyn M Beach1, Tomislav Mihaljevic, Lars G Svensson
1Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Insights
Patients with severe aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease undergoing both aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting have poorer outcomes. Early intervention with AVR+CABG is recommended before myocardial damage occurs.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Interventional Cardiology
- Clinical Outcomes Research
Background:
- Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a common comorbidity in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS).
- The survival implications of concurrent CAD in severe AS patients are often underestimated.
- Concurrent CAD can influence risk profiles and outcomes in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR).
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare risk profiles and outcomes of patients with severe AS and CAD undergoing AVR plus coronary artery bypass grafting (AVR+CABG).
- To contrast these outcomes with patients who have isolated severe AS undergoing AVR alone.
- To identify shared and unique mortality risk factors in these patient groups.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 2,286 patients undergoing AVR+CABG and 1,637 undergoing AVR alone (October 1991 - July 2010).
- Propensity score matching created 1,082 patient pairs for outcome comparison.
- Long-term mortality analyses were performed to identify risk factors.
Main Results:
- Patients with AS+CAD were older, more symptomatic, had lower ejection fraction, and greater arteriosclerotic burden but less severe AS.
- AS+CAD patients experienced poorer hospital morbidity and 10-year survival (43% vs. 59%).
- Early mortality in AS+CAD was linked to CAD; late mortality to left ventricular dysfunction. Optimal outcomes were seen in isolated AS with few comorbidities.
Conclusions:
- Management of severe AS requires careful consideration of cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities.
- Patients with severe AS and concurrent CAD risk factors benefit from early diagnostics and AVR+CABG.
- Intervention before ischemic myocardial damage is crucial for improving outcomes in AS+CAD patients.
Objectives:
The study sought to contrast risk profiles and compare outcomes of patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and coronary artery disease (CAD) who underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR) and coronary artery bypass grafting (AS+CABG) with those of patients with isolated AS who underwent AVR alone.
Background:
In patients with severe AS, CAD is often an incidental finding with underappreciated survival implications.
Methods:
From October 1991 to July 2010, 2,286 patients underwent AVR+CABG and 1,637 AVR alone. A propensity score was developed and used for matched comparisons of outcomes (1,082 patient pairs). Analyses of long-term mortality were performed for each group, then combined to identify common and unique risk factors.
Results:
Patients with AS+CAD versus isolated AS were older, more symptomatic, and more likely to be hypertensive, and had lower ejection fraction and greater arteriosclerotic burden but less severe AS. Hospital morbidity and long-term survival were poorer (43% vs. 59% at 10 years). Both groups shared many mortality risk factors; however, early risk among AS+CAD patients reflected effects of CAD; late risk reflected diastolic left ventricular dysfunction expressed as ventricular hypertrophy and left atrial enlargement. Patients with isolated AS and few comorbidities had the best outcome, those with CAD without myocardial damage had intermediate outcome equivalent to propensity-matched isolated AS patients, and those with CAD, myocardial damage, and advanced comorbidities had the worst outcome.
Conclusions:
Cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities must be considered in managing patients with severe AS. Patients with severe AS and CAD risk factors should undergo early diagnostics and AVR+CABG before ischemic myocardial damage occurs.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Mitral Stenosis IV: Nursing Management

