Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 14, 2026

12:01
The Superficial Inferior Epigastric Artery Fascia Flap for Nerve Reconstruction in Rabbits
Published on: June 13, 2025
Perineal reconstruction with local flaps: technique and results
1Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington Street, Box 6190, Boston, MA, 02111, USA, bruce_orkin@rush.edu.
Techniques in Coloproctology
|February 23, 2013
Summary
Local flap reconstruction effectively repairs large perineal defects after wide excisions, preserving anal canal function and continence in most patients. This method is generally safe, even for immunocompromised individuals, but should be avoided in irradiated patients.
Area of Science:
- Surgical reconstruction
- Perineal defect management
- Anal canal reconstruction
Background:
- Wide excision of perineal lesions, including the anal canal, presents significant closure challenges, particularly when preserving continence.
- Reconstruction of large perineal defects is complex, necessitating effective surgical techniques.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of local flap reconstruction for large perineal defects following wide excisions.
- To assess functional outcomes, including continence, after local flap repair.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective review of 20 patients undergoing wide perineal/anal canal excisions and local flap reconstruction (1994-2009).
- Indications included squamous cell carcinoma, Buschke-Lowenstein tumors, and other conditions. Procedures involved wide local excision or abdominoperineal resection (APR).
- Reconstruction utilized bilateral local flaps (V-Y or S), with 13 patients preserving the anal canal.
Main Results:
- No perioperative deaths; mean hospital stay was 4.2 days. Wound dehiscence occurred in 30% of patients, with radiation identified as a significant risk factor.
- Long-term follow-up showed 12 of 14 eligible patients with an intact anal canal achieved full continence, and 2 had partial continence.
- Outcomes were generally favorable, even in immunocompromised patients, though local flaps were problematic in irradiated cases.
Conclusions:
- Local flap reconstruction is a viable and effective method for managing large perineal and anal canal defects.
- Continence can often be preserved following this reconstructive approach.
- Caution is advised, and local flaps should be avoided in patients with prior radiation therapy to the perineum.