Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 13, 2026
Biomechanical Changes Related to Low Back Pain: An Innovative Tool for Movement Pattern Assessment and Treatment Evaluation in Rehabilitation
Published on: December 13, 2024
Effectiveness of back school versus McKenzie exercises in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain: a
Alessandra Narciso Garcia1, Lucíola da Cunha Menezes Costa, Tatiane Mota da Silva
1Universidade Cidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Background:
Back School and McKenzie methods are popular active treatment approaches that include both exercises and information for patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain.
Objective:
The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of Back School and McKenzie methods in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain.
Design:
The study was a prospectively registered, 2-arm randomized controlled trial with a blinded assessor.
Setting:
The study was conducted in the outpatient physical therapy clinic in São Paulo, Brazil.
Patients:
The study participants were 148 patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain.
Interventions:
The 4-week treatment program (one session/week) was based on the Back School (delivered to the group) or McKenzie (delivered individually) principles. The participants also were instructed to perform a daily set of home exercises.
Measurements:
Clinical outcomes were assessed at follow-up appointments at 1, 3, and 6 months after randomization. Primary outcome measures were pain intensity (measured by the 0-10 pain numerical rating scale) and disability (measured by the 24-item Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire) 1 month after randomization. Secondary outcome measures were pain intensity and disability at 3 and 6 months after randomization, quality of life (measured by the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF instrument) at 1, 3, and 6 months after randomization, and trunk flexion range of motion measured by an inclinometer at 1 month after randomization. The data were collected by a blinded assessor.
Results:
Participants allocated to the McKenzie group had greater improvements in disability at 1 month (mean effect=2.37 points, 95% confidence interval=0.76 to 3.99) but not for pain (mean effect=0.66 points, 95% confidence interval=-0.29 to 1.62). No between-group differences were observed for all secondary outcome measures.
Limitations:
It was not possible to monitor the home exercise program. Therapists and participants were not blinded.
Conclusions:
The McKenzie method (a more resource-intensive intervention) was slightly more effective than the Back School method for disability, but not for pain intensity immediately after treatment in participants with chronic low back pain.