Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 13, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
Published on: February 16, 2011
Five things physicians and patients should question in hospice and palliative medicine
Daniel Fischberg1, Janet Bull, David Casarett
1Department of Geriatric Medicine, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA. dfischberg@queens.org
Abstract:
Overuse or misuse of tests and treatments exposes patients to potential harm. The American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation's Choosing Wisely® campaign is a multiyear effort to encourage physician leadership in reducing harmful or inappropriate resource utilization. Via the campaign, medical societies are asked to identify five tests or procedures commonly used in their field, the routine use of which in specific clinical scenarios should be questioned by both physicians and patients based on the evidence that the test or procedure is ineffective or even harmful. The American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine (AAHPM) was invited, and it agreed to participate in the campaign. The AAHPM Choosing Wisely Task Force, with input from the AAHPM membership, developed the following five recommendations: 1) Don't recommend percutaneous feeding tubes in patients with advanced dementia; instead, offer oral-assisted feeding; 2) Don't delay palliative care for a patient with serious illness who has physical, psychological, social, or spiritual distress because they are pursuing disease-directed treatment; 3) Don't leave an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator activated when it is inconsistent with the patient/family goals of care; 4) Don't recommend more than a single fraction of palliative radiation for an uncomplicated painful bone metastasis; and 5) Don't use topical lorazepam (Ativan®), diphenhydramine (Benadryl®), and haloperidol (Haldol®) (ABH) gel for nausea. These recommendations and their supporting rationale should be considered by physicians, patients, and their caregivers as they collaborate in choosing those treatments that do the most good and avoid the most harm for those living with serious illness.
Insights
The American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine developed five recommendations to reduce patient harm from unnecessary medical interventions. These guidelines aim to improve care for serious illnesses by questioning common tests and treatments.
Area of Science:
- Palliative Care
- Medical Ethics
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Overuse of medical tests and treatments can lead to patient harm.
- The Choosing Wisely campaign encourages physicians to reduce unnecessary resource utilization.
- Medical societies identify tests/procedures that should be questioned in specific scenarios.
Purpose of the Study:
- To present the American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine's (AAHPM) five Choosing Wisely recommendations.
- To guide physicians and patients in making informed decisions about care for serious illnesses.
- To reduce potentially harmful or ineffective interventions.
Main Methods:
- The AAHPM Choosing Wisely Task Force, with member input, developed recommendations.
- Recommendations focus on questioning common tests and treatments based on evidence.
- Five specific recommendations were identified for hospice and palliative care.
Main Results:
- Recommendation 1: Prefer oral-assisted feeding over percutaneous feeding tubes for advanced dementia.
- Recommendation 2: Do not delay palliative care for patients with serious illness experiencing distress, even if pursuing disease-directed treatment.
- Recommendation 3: Deactivate implantable cardioverter-defibrillators when inconsistent with patient/family goals of care.
- Recommendation 4: Limit palliative radiation for uncomplicated painful bone metastasis to a single fraction.
- Recommendation 5: Avoid topical lorazepam, diphenhydramine, and haloperidol gel for nausea.
Conclusions:
- These recommendations aim to optimize care by avoiding ineffective or harmful interventions.
- Shared decision-making between physicians, patients, and caregivers is crucial.
- Implementing these guidelines can improve the quality of care for individuals with serious illnesses.
Related Concept Videos
Continuing Care
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Ethical Dilemmas II
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's cancer...
Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting
Long-Term Care Facilities
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...