Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Remedies by competitors for false advertising.

B D Hirsch, D P Wilcox

    Texas Medicine
    |May 1, 1990
    PubMed
    Summary

    Physicians and patients harmed by deceptive medical advertising can pursue legal action. Competitors can also sue for unfair competition under the Lanham Act, addressing false claims and credentials.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Caution required when contracting with managed care organizations.

    Texas medicine·1993
    Same author

    Managed care Q&A.

    Texas medicine·1993
    Same author

    Recognizing physicians' rights under exclusive contracts.

    Texas medicine·1993
    Same author

    Important case addresses blood transfusions, expert witnesses, and informed consent.

    Texas medicine·1993
    Same author

    What happens when your patient's records are subpoenaed?

    Texas medicine·1993
    Same author

    What role do expert witnesses play in malpractice lawsuits?

    Texas medicine·1992

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Law
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Medicine

    Background:

    • False medical advertising can harm patients and create an uneven playing field for healthcare providers.
    • Deceptive practices undermine the principle of informed consent in patient care.
    • The Lanham Act provides a legal framework for addressing false advertising in commerce, including healthcare.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To examine legal remedies available for victims of false medical advertising.
    • To explore litigation options for competing physicians against those engaging in deceptive practices.
    • To analyze the implications of untruthful healthcare advertising on patient rights and fair competition.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act regarding deceptive advertising.
    • Review of legal precedents concerning physician advertising and patient claims.
    • Examination of malpractice and unfair competition litigation related to healthcare marketing.

    Main Results:

    • Patients injured due to reliance on false medical advertising can sue for malpractice.
    • Competing physicians can initiate civil actions for damages against those making false claims about skills, results, or credentials.
    • Deceptive advertising violates patient rights to informed consent and constitutes unfair competition.

    Conclusions:

    • Legal recourse exists for patients and competitors harmed by untruthful medical advertising.
    • Physicians and healthcare providers face significant litigation risks for engaging in deceptive marketing.
    • Upholding truthfulness in medical advertising is crucial for patient welfare and fair market practices.

    Related Experiment Videos