Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Space-Time Curvature and the General Theory of Relativity

Space-Time Curvature and the General Theory of Relativity

In 1905, Albert Einstein published his special theory of relativity. According to this theory, no matter in the universe can attain a speed greater than the speed of light in a vacuum, which thus serves as the speed limit of the universe.
This has been verified in many experiments. However, space and time are no longer absolute. Two observers moving relative to one another do not agree on the length of objects or the passage of time. The mechanics of objects based on Newton's laws of motion,...

Rocket Propulsion in Empty Space - I

Rocket Propulsion in Empty Space - I

The driving force for the motion of any vehicle is friction, but in the case of rocket propulsion in space, the friction force is not present. The motion of a rocket changes its velocity (and hence its momentum) by ejecting burned fuel gases, thus causing it to accelerate in the direction opposite to the velocity of the ejected fuel. In this situation, the mass and velocity of the rocket constantly change along with the total mass of ejected gases. Due to conservation of momentum, the rocket's...

Rocket Propulsion In Empty Space - II

Rocket Propulsion In Empty Space - II

The motion of a rocket is governed by the conservation of momentum principle. A rocket's momentum changes by the same amount (with the opposite sign) as the ejected gases. As time goes by, the rocket's mass (which includes the mass of the remaining fuel) continuously decreases, and its velocity increases. Therefore, the principle of conservation of momentum is used to explain the dynamics of a rocket's motion. The ideal rocket equation gives the change in velocity that a rocket experiences by...

State Space Representation

State Space Representation

The frequency-domain technique, commonly used in analyzing and designing feedback control systems, is effective for linear, time-invariant systems. However, it falls short when dealing with nonlinear, time-varying, and multiple-input multiple-output systems. The time-domain or state-space approach addresses these limitations by utilizing state variables to construct simultaneous, first-order differential equations, known as state equations, for an nth-order system.
Consider an RLC circuit, a...

Collisions in Multiple Dimensions: Introduction

Collisions in Multiple Dimensions: Introduction

It is far more common for collisions to occur in two dimensions; that is, the initial velocity vectors are neither parallel nor antiparallel to each other. Let's see what complications arise from this. The first idea is that momentum is a vector. Like all vectors, it can be expressed as a sum of perpendicular components (usually, though not always, an x-component and a y-component, and a z-component if necessary). Thus, when the statement of conservation of momentum is written for a problem,...

Collisions in Multiple Dimensions: Problem Solving

Collisions in Multiple Dimensions: Problem Solving

In multiple dimensions, the conservation of momentum applies in each direction independently. Hence, to solve collisions in multiple dimensions, we should write down the momentum conservation in each direction separately. To help understand collisions in multiple dimensions, consider an example.
A small car of mass 1,200 kg traveling east at 60 km/h collides at an intersection with a truck of mass 3,000 kg traveling due north at 40 km/h. The two vehicles are locked together. What is the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

The vigilance decrement: its first 75 years.

Frontiers in cognition·2026

Same author

Does the output form of inhibition of return operate at or after the bottleneck?

Acta psychologica·2025

Same author

Role of social competence in emotion processing among emerging adults with anxiety.

Scientific reports·2025

Same author

Attention to Instagram features in female youth with anxiety symptoms.

Comprehensive psychiatry·2025

Same author

Posner's Endogenous Beam Is (Still) Not Treisman's Glue.

Experimental psychology·2025

Same author

Attentional biases for dynamic stimuli in emerging adults with anxiety: A preliminary eye-tracking study.

Journal of psychiatric research·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 13, 2026

Perspectives on Neuroscience

Perspectives on Neuroscience

Published on: July 31, 2007

Searching in space and in time.

Raymond M Klein¹, Yoko Ishigami

¹Dalhousie University, 6299 South Street, B3H3J5 Halifax, NS, Canada. Ray.Klein@Dal.Ca

Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation

|February 27, 2013

Summary

Investigating attentional selection, this study explored if a single attentional beam guides both spatial and temporal search. Preliminary results suggest separate mechanisms for spatial and temporal attention.

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Neuroscience
Human Perception

Background:

Attention is crucial for limited processing capacity, requiring selection of relevant stimuli in space and time.
Seminal research established tasks for exploring attentional properties during search.
The nature of attentional selection, particularly its integration across space and time, remains an open question.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate whether a single attentional mechanism operates across both spatial and temporal domains.
To determine if attentional selection for objects and actions is unified or domain-specific.

Main Methods:

Examined error patterns in participants performing search tasks.
Compared performance on tasks with targets distributed over time versus targets presented simultaneously in space.

More Related Videos

Trajectory Data Analyses for Pedestrian Space-time Activity Study

Trajectory Data Analyses for Pedestrian Space-time Activity Study

Published on: February 25, 2013

Assessing Human Spatial Navigation in a Virtual Space and its Sensitivity to Exercise

Assessing Human Spatial Navigation in a Virtual Space and its Sensitivity to Exercise

Published on: January 26, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 13, 2026

Perspectives on Neuroscience

Perspectives on Neuroscience

Published on: July 31, 2007

Trajectory Data Analyses for Pedestrian Space-time Activity Study

Trajectory Data Analyses for Pedestrian Space-time Activity Study

Published on: February 25, 2013

Assessing Human Spatial Navigation in a Virtual Space and its Sensitivity to Exercise

Assessing Human Spatial Navigation in a Virtual Space and its Sensitivity to Exercise

Published on: January 26, 2024

Utilized established experimental paradigms for spatial and temporal search.

Main Results:

Preliminary findings indicate a null correlation between spatial and temporal error slippage.
Error distributions suggest distinct selection processes for spatial and temporal search domains.
No evidence was found for a unified attentional beam integrating features across space and time.

Conclusions:

The results support the hypothesis of separate attentional selection mechanisms for spatial and temporal information.
This suggests that the brain employs distinct systems for processing stimuli based on their location and their occurrence over time.
Further research is needed to fully elucidate the interplay between these separate attentional systems.