Related Experiment Videos
Components of Stroop-like interference in word reading.
Acta Psychologica
|March 1, 1990
Summary
Semantic interference in naming tasks is reduced when using word reading instead of picture naming. This suggests that interference effects are specific to the target-name retrieval process, not general semantic processing.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Psycholinguistics
- Experimental Psychology
Background:
- Picture naming shows Stroop-like interference when distractors share semantic categories.
- Semantic similarity and relevance of distractor words contribute to this interference.
- Previous research suggests interference originates in target-name retrieval.
Purpose of the Study:
- To test if semantic interference effects diminish in a word-reading task compared to picture naming.
- To investigate the influence of semantic relatedness, relevance, response set membership, and wordness on interference.
- To determine if interference is specific to name retrieval or a more general semantic process.
Main Methods:
- Experiments compared semantic interference effects in picture naming versus word reading tasks.
- Four distractor characteristics were systematically varied: semantic relatedness, relevance, response set membership, and wordness.
- Response times were measured to assess interference effects.
Main Results:
- Semantic interference effects were not significant in the word-reading task, unlike in picture naming.
- Only the 'wordness' of the distractor significantly affected responses in the word-reading task.
- Further experiments confirmed that limited distractor exposure time did not account for the absence of semantic effects.
Conclusions:
- The findings support a name-retrieval account for semantic interference in naming tasks.
- Semantic interference appears specific to the process of retrieving the name of a target, rather than general semantic processing.
- The locus of semantic interference is likely within the lexical access stage of speech production.