Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 13, 2026
07:05
Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
Published on: September 10, 2018
Decision-making accuracy in reactive agility: quantifying the cost of poor decisions
Greg J Henry1, Brian Dawson, Brendan S Lay
11School of Sport Science, Exercise and Health, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia; and 2School of Human Movement and Sport Sciences, University of Ballarat, Victoria, Australia.
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
|February 27, 2013
Summary
Higher-skilled Australian footballers show better decision accuracy in reactive agility tasks. Training decision-making, especially with feints, can improve performance for lesser-skilled players.
Area of Science:
- Sports Science
- Motor Control
- Human Movement
Background:
- Reactive agility is crucial in sports, involving rapid decision-making and execution.
- Skill level significantly impacts performance in dynamic sports scenarios.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare decision-making accuracy and response time costs between higher- and lower-standard Australian footballers.
- To investigate the influence of feint and nonfeint scenarios on reactive agility performance.
Main Methods:
- Participants: 14 higher-standard and 14 lower-standard Australian footballers.
- Task: Reactive agility tasks with feint and nonfeint stimuli.
- Measures: Decision accuracy and agility time for correct/incorrect responses.
Main Results:
- Overall decision accuracy decreased from the first (94%) to the second stimulus (83%).
- Lower-standard players showed a significant accuracy drop between stimuli (92% to 78%), unlike higher-standard players.
- Incorrect decisions generally increased agility time, but anticipating a feint could improve performance.
Conclusions:
- Decision-making errors negatively impact reactive agility, but successful feint anticipation can enhance performance.
- Higher-standard footballers exhibit superior anticipation and are less susceptible to feints.
- Targeted training to improve decision accuracy, particularly with feints, is recommended for lesser-skilled players.
Related Concept Videos
01:20Decision Making
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
01:37Reason and Intuition
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...
01:09Decision Making: P-value Method
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
01:14Decision Making: Traditional Method
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
01:25The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the $2,000...
01:08The Availability Heuristic
A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):