Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 13, 2026

State of the Art Cranial Ultrasound Imaging in Neonates
Published on: February 2, 2015
Different guidelines for imaging after first UTI in febrile infants: yield, cost, and radiation
Claudio La Scola1, Chiara De Mutiis, Ian K Hewitt
1Nephrology, Dialysis Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Insights
No single diagnostic protocol is ideal for children after their first febrile urinary tract infection. Aggressive approaches detect more vesicoureteral reflux and scarring but increase costs and radiation exposure.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Nephrology
- Diagnostic Imaging
- Health Economics
Background:
- Febrile urinary tract infections (UTIs) in children can lead to renal scarring and vesicoureteral reflux (VUR).
- Diagnostic algorithms aim to identify these complications efficiently, balancing yield with cost and radiation exposure.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the diagnostic yield, economic costs, and radiation exposure of five different diagnostic algorithms versus a comprehensive testing protocol for children following their first febrile UTI.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 304 children (2-36 months) from a randomized controlled trial.
- Simulated application of five guideline-based diagnostic protocols: Melbourne Royal Children's Hospital, National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE), top down approach, American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), and Italian Society of Pediatric Nephrology.
- Primary outcomes: diagnostic yield for VUR and renal scarring. Secondary outcomes: economic and radiation costs.
Main Results:
- Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) identified in 22% and scarring in 15% of children.
- The 'top down' approach had the highest sensitivity for VUR (76%) and scarring (100%) but also the highest costs (€52,268) and radiation (624 mSv).
- NICE and AAP protocols showed high specificity for VUR (90%), with NICE being least costly (€26,838) and AAP having lowest radiation (42 mSv).
Conclusions:
- No single diagnostic protocol is optimal for evaluating children after a first febrile UTI.
- Aggressive protocols offer high sensitivity for detecting VUR and scarring but incur significant financial and radiation burdens.
- The choice of protocol involves a trade-off between diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, cost, and radiation exposure.
Objective:
To evaluate the yield, economic, and radiation costs of 5 diagnostic algorithms compared with a protocol where all tests are performed (ultrasonography scan, cystography, and late technetium(99)dimercaptosuccinic acid scan) in children after the first febrile urinary tract infections.
Methods:
A total of 304 children, 2 to 36 months of age, who completed the diagnostic follow-up (ultrasonography, cystourethrography, and acute and late technetium(99)dimercaptosuccinic acid scans) of a randomized controlled trial (Italian Renal Infection Study 1) were eligible. The guidelines applied to this cohort in a retrospective simulation were: Melbourne Royal Children's Hospital, National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE), top down approach, American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), and Italian Society of Pediatric Nephrology. Primary outcomes were the yield of abnormal tests for each diagnostic protocol; secondary outcomes were the economic and radiation costs.
Results:
Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) was identified in 66 (22%) children and a parenchymal scarring was identified in 45 (15%). For detection of VUR (47/66) and scarring (45/45), the top down approach showed the highest sensitivity (76% and 100%, respectively) but also the highest economic and radiation costs (€52 268. 624 mSv). NICE (19/66) and AAP (18/66) had the highest specificities for VUR (90%) and the Italian Society of Pediatric Nephrology had the highest specificity (20/45) for scars (86%). NICE would have been the least costly (€26 838) and AAP would have resulted in the least radiation exposure (42 mSv).
Conclusions:
There is no ideal diagnostic protocol following a first febrile urinary tract infection. An aggressive protocol has a high sensitivity for detecting VUR and scarring but carries high financial and radiation costs with questionable benefit.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies V: Intravenous Urography and Retrograde Pyelography
Imaging Studies II: Ultrasonography
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Urinary Tract Infection III: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care

