Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 13, 2026

Use of a Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device/Left Atrium to Femoral Artery Bypass System for Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: August 16, 2021
Use of the LUCAS mechanical chest compression device for percutaneous coronary intervention during cardiac arrest: is
G Biondi-Zoccai1, G Landoni, A Zangrillo
1Division of Cardiology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Insights
Mechanical chest compression devices like LUCAS aid cardiac arrest management during procedures. However, randomized trials are needed to confirm their benefit over manual chest compressions.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Emergency Medicine
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Cardiopulmonary support, including chest compressions, is critical for cardiac arrest.
- Manual chest compressions present logistical challenges during emergent procedures like percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction.
Observation:
- The LUCAS device offers automated, external chest compressions, facilitating invasive procedures without compromising cardiopulmonary support.
- Current clinical use is supported by observational studies and expert consensus.
Findings:
- No randomized trials have definitively proven the superiority of mechanical chest compression devices over manual methods.
- The benefit of mechanical devices in improving outcomes for cardiac arrest patients undergoing PCI remains unproven in high-level evidence.
Implications:
- Further research, specifically randomized controlled trials, is necessary to establish the efficacy of mechanical chest compression devices.
- Evidence-based guidelines are needed to clarify the role of these devices in managing specific cardiac arrest scenarios.
Abstract:
Cardiopulmonary support including closed chest compression is a mainstay in the management of cardiac arrest. However, traditional means (i.e. manual) chest compression may be logistically challenging, especially in patients requiring emergent invasive procedures such as percutaneous coronary intervention for cardiac arrest due to acute myocardial infarction. The LUCAS mechanical chest compression device provides external and automated closed chest compression, thus enabling even complex invasive procedures without interrupting cardiopulmonary support. Nonetheless, no randomized trial has proved to date its benefit in comparison to standard manual chest compression, and to date only observational studies and consensus opinion support its clinical use.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation II: ACLS Airway Management
