Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Fine tuning total knee replacement contact force prediction algorithms using blinded model validation.

Hannah J Lundberg1, Christopher Knowlton, Markus A Wimmer

  • 1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 West Harrison, Chicago, IL 60612, USA. Hannah_Lundberg@rush.edu

Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
|March 1, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

Knee Joint01:23

Knee Joint

The knee joint is the most complicated joint in the body. It consists of three articulations– two tibiofemoral and one patellofemoral. As is characteristic of synovial joints, the knee joint has a thin articular capsule that partially surrounds this joint cavity. Additionally, several ligaments, muscles, and cartilaginous structures support the movement of the knee.
A total of seven ligaments support the knee joint. The patellar ligament, which is also attached to the quadriceps femoris group...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Neuromuscular Characteristics Associated with Knee Instability in Osteoarthritis and After Total Knee Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Clinics and practice·2026
Same author

KChIP4a is a Biophysical Amplifier of Inhibition in Atypical Dopamine Neurons and Controls Learning from Negative Prediction Errors.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2026
Same author

Pirfenidone Attenuates Fibrosis and Neovascularization in 3D Spheroid-Laden Hydrogel Culture.

Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine·2026
Same author

Titanium Nitride Coatings on CoCrMo and Ti6Al4V Alloys: Effects on Wear and Ion Release.

Lubricants (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Friction and Cartilage Wear in Hemiarthroplasty: A Systematic Review of Key Influencing Factors.

Lubricants (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Time-dependent corrosion response of cobalt alloy implants to hyaluronic acid-phospholipid vesicles.

Acta biomaterialia·2026
Same journal

Computational Determination of Effective Working Length in Experimental Torsion Testing of Long Bones.

Journal of biomechanical engineering·2026
Same journal

Hierarchical Experimental Characterization of the Human Rib Cage for Non-Lethal Projectile Impact Applications.

Journal of biomechanical engineering·2026
Same journal

An in vitro Experimental Model for Investigating Aortic Pressure Dynamics Under Blunt Thoracic Impacts.

Journal of biomechanical engineering·2026
Same journal

Editorial.

Journal of biomechanical engineering·2026
Same journal

Student Paper Competition of the 2025 ASME SB3C Summer Bioengineering Conference.

Journal of biomechanical engineering·2026
Same journal

Biomechanical Principles of Temporal Muscle Activation in Functional Movements: Implications for Stability and Movement Coordination.

Journal of biomechanical engineering·2026
See all related articles

This study compared knee replacement contact force predictions to in vivo data, finding models accurately predicted axial forces. Detailed knee kinematics, like anterior-posterior translation, are crucial for precise force predictions.

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Orthopedic surgery
  • Computational modeling

Background:

  • Accurate prediction of knee joint contact forces is vital for understanding total knee replacement (TKR) performance.
  • Existing computational models require validation against in vivo data to assess their predictive capabilities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare model predictions of knee contact forces with in vivo measurements during normal and medial thrust gait.
  • To evaluate the impact of model assumptions on the accuracy of predicted knee loads.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a validated parametric numerical model to calculate medial, lateral, and total axial knee contact forces.
  • Participated in the "Third Grand Challenge Competition to Predict in vivo Knee Loads" for blinded model-device comparison.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Varied muscle activity levels within the model to generate a range of force predictions.

    • Main Results:

    • Model predictions showed root mean square differences of 234-470 N compared to in vivo eTibia data across gait styles.
    • Percent differences in peak total axial force between measured and predicted values ranged from 2.89% to 14.86%.
    • Adjusting model assumptions improved medial and lateral force predictions but not total force predictions.

    Conclusions:

    • The parametric model provides comparable axial force predictions to in vivo data under both blinded and unblinded conditions.
    • Accurate prediction of knee joint contact forces necessitates detailed knowledge of knee kinematics, particularly anterior-posterior translation.