Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Obedience01:08

Obedience

According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation, obedience...
Persuasion Strategies01:52

Persuasion Strategies

Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
Cognitive Dissonance01:38

Cognitive Dissonance

Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...
Self-Discrepancy Theory02:45

Self-Discrepancy Theory

One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.
Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy01:24

Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy

Cognitive-behavioral therapies (CBTs) are grounded in the belief that our thoughts profoundly influence our emotions and actions. Advocates of CBT emphasize three core assumptions: first, that cognitions are identifiable and measurable; second, that they are central to psychological functioning; and third, that irrational or maladaptive beliefs can be replaced with rational and adaptive ones. This transformative approach to therapy has paved the way for specific models such as Albert Ellis's...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sexual selection expedites the evolution of pesticide resistance.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2016
Same author

N-terminus oligomerization is conserved in intracellular calcium release channels.

The Biochemical journal·2014
Same journal

Surrogacy and the Moral Significance of Gestation: Reassessing Procreative Responsibilities.

Bioethics·2026
Same journal

Capable, Unbearably Suffering, and Excluded: People With Mental Illness and the Ethics of Canada's Assisted-Dying Regime.

Bioethics·2026
Same journal

Transhumanism Without Transindividuation in the Age Without Epochality: Stiegler, Vice, and Radical Human Enhancement.

Bioethics·2026
Same journal

Between Safeguard and Constraint: Navigating Patient Autonomy in Protective Laws for Medical Assistance in Dying.

Bioethics·2026
Same journal

Bioethics of Space Exploration: Life, Risk, and Responsibility Beyond Earth.

Bioethics·2026
Same journal

The Concept of Harm in Medical Ethics.

Bioethics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 13, 2026

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

Conscientious refusals and reason-giving.

Jason Marsh

    Bioethics
    |March 1, 2013
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Philosophers propose a reason-giving requirement for conscientious refusal in healthcare, demanding public arguments for objections. This study finds the requirement poses an epistemic challenge, being either too easy or too difficult to meet in practice.

    Keywords:
    conscienceconscientious refusalepistemologymetaphilosophyreasonsreligion

    More Related Videos

    Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
    06:08

    Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

    Published on: July 22, 2025

    The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling
    06:51

    The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling

    Published on: April 6, 2018

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: May 13, 2026

    The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
    05:48

    The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

    Published on: June 12, 2020

    Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
    06:08

    Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

    Published on: July 22, 2025

    The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling
    06:51

    The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling

    Published on: April 6, 2018

    Area of Science:

    • Bioethics
    • Philosophy of Medicine
    • Reproductive Healthcare Ethics

    Background:

    • The concept of conscientious refusal in healthcare allows practitioners to decline participation in treatments based on moral or religious beliefs.
    • A proposed 'reason-giving requirement' mandates that such objections must be supported by publicly accessible arguments.
    • This requirement aims to balance individual conscience with the need for transparent and justifiable healthcare practices.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To critically evaluate the epistemic feasibility of the reason-giving requirement for conscientious refusal in reproductive healthcare.
    • To identify and analyze the potential challenges in satisfying the public character of arguments supporting conscientious objections.

    Main Methods:

    • Philosophical analysis of ethical arguments concerning conscientious objection.
    • Examination of the epistemic conditions required for justifying moral claims in a public healthcare context.
    • Case-based reasoning to assess the practical application of the reason-giving requirement in standard reproductive healthcare scenarios.

    Main Results:

    • The reason-giving requirement, while seemingly reasonable, presents significant epistemic difficulties.
    • In typical cases, the requirement is found to be either trivially easy to satisfy or insurmountably difficult.
    • This suggests a fundamental flaw in the structure or applicability of the proposed epistemic standard for conscientious refusal.

    Conclusions:

    • The standard version of the reason-giving requirement for conscientious refusal in reproductive healthcare is problematic due to its epistemic challenges.
    • Further consideration is needed to determine if a modified version of the requirement could be viable.
    • The findings have implications for policy and ethical guidelines regarding healthcare provider objections.