Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 13, 2026

In Vitro Enzyme Measurement to Test Pharmacological Chaperone Responsiveness in Fabry and Pompe Disease
Published on: December 20, 2017
Enzyme replacement therapy for Anderson-Fabry disease
Regina P El Dib1, Paulo Nascimento, Gregory M Pastores
1Botucatu Medical School, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Botucatu, Brazil. eldib@fmb.unesp.br.
Insights
Enzyme replacement therapy for Anderson-Fabry disease shows limited evidence. Agalsidase alfa improved pain, while agalsidase beta showed some biomarker improvements, but overall trial quality is poor.
Area of Science:
- Genetics and Metabolism
- Rare Diseases
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Anderson-Fabry disease is an X-linked genetic disorder affecting glycosphingolipid metabolism.
- It leads to progressive renal insufficiency, cardiovascular complications, and reduced survival.
- Symptomatic female carriers also experience significant health issues.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) for Anderson-Fabry disease.
- To compare ERT with placebo, no intervention, or other treatments.
- To synthesize evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
Main Methods:
- Searched major databases (Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS) and a specialized trials register up to September 2012.
- Included RCTs of agalsidase alfa or beta in diagnosed Anderson-Fabry disease patients.
- Two authors independently selected trials, assessed quality, and extracted data.
Main Results:
- Six trials with 223 participants were included.
- Agalsidase alfa showed no significant effect on biomarkers but improved pain scores and quality of life in some analyses.
- Agalsidase beta demonstrated significant improvements in biomarkers (kidney, heart, composite) but not mortality or pain; head-to-head comparison showed no significant difference in adverse events.
Conclusions:
- The current evidence from six small, low-quality RCTs is insufficient to robustly support the use of agalsidase alfa or beta for Anderson-Fabry disease.
- Further high-quality research is needed to establish the true efficacy and safety of ERT.
- The findings highlight the need for improved trial design in rare genetic disorders.
Background:
Anderson-Fabry disease is an X-linked defect of glycosphingolipid metabolism. Progressive renal insufficiency is a major source of morbidity, additional complications result from cardio- and cerebro-vascular involvement. Survival is reduced among affected males and symptomatic female carriers.
Objectives:
To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of enzyme replacement therapy compared to other interventions, placebo or no interventions, for treating Anderson-Fabry disease.
Search Methods:
We searched 'Clinical Trials' on The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS and the Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Inborn Errors of Metabolism Trials Register (date of the most recent search: 11 September 2012). The original search was performed in September 2008.Date of the most recent search of the Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Inborn Errors of Metabolism Trials Register: 11 September 2012.
Selection Criteria:
Randomized controlled trials of agalsidase alfa or beta in participants diagnosed with Anderson-Fabry disease.
Data Collection And Analysis:
Two authors selected relevant trials, assessed methodological quality and extracted data.
Main Results:
Six trials comparing either agalsidase alfa or beta in 223 participants fulfilled the selection criteria.Both trials comparing agalsidase alfa to placebo reported on globotriaosylceramide concentration in plasma and tissue; aggregate results were non-significant. One trial reported pain scores, there was a statistically significant improvement for participants receiving treatment at up to three months, mean difference -2.10 (95% confidence interval (CI) -3.79 to -0.41); at up to five months, mean difference -1.90 (95% CI -3.65 to -0.15); and at up to six months, mean difference -2.00 (95% CI -3.66 to -0.34). There was a significant difference in pain-related quality of life at over five months and up to six months, mean difference -2.10 (95% CI -3.92 to -0.28) but not at other time-points. Neither trial reported deaths.One of the three trials comparing agalsidase beta to placebo reported on globotriaosylceramide concentration in plasma and tissue and showed significant improvement: kidney, mean difference -1.70 (95% CI -2.09 to -1.31); heart, mean difference -0.90 (95% CI -1.18 to -0.62); and composite results (renal, cardiac, and cerebrovascular complications and death), mean difference -4.80 (95% CI -5.45 to -4.15). There was no significant difference between groups for death; no trials reported on pain.Only one trial compared agalsidase alfa to agalsidase beta. There was no significant difference between the groups for any adverse events, risk ratio 0.36 (95% CI 0.08 to 1.59), or any serious adverse events; risk ratio 0.30; 95% CI 0.03 to 2.57).
Authors' Conclusions:
Six small, poor quality randomised controlled trials provide no robust evidence for use of either agalsidase alfa and beta to treat Anderson-Fabry disease.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Gene Therapy
Gene Therapy
Cystic Fibrosis: Management
Sinus disease and chronic sinusitis...
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System

