Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 13, 2026

Determining Soil-transmitted Helminth Infection Status and Physical Fitness of School-aged Children
Published on: August 22, 2012
Effects of unconditional and conditional cash transfers on child health and development in Zimbabwe: a
Laura Robertson1, Phyllis Mushati, Jeffrey W Eaton
1Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK. l.robertson06@imperial.ac.uk
Insights
Cash transfers in Zimbabwe improved child wellbeing. Conditional cash transfers (CCTs) significantly increased birth registration, while both unconditional (UCTs) and CCTs boosted school attendance for vulnerable children.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Development Economics
- Social Welfare
Background:
- Cash transfer programs show potential for improving vulnerable children's well-being.
- Rigorous assessments of cash transfers' effectiveness in sub-Saharan Africa are limited.
- This study examined unconditional cash transfers (UCTs) and conditional cash transfers (CCTs) in Zimbabwe.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of UCTs and CCTs on birth registration, vaccination uptake, and school attendance.
- To provide evidence on the effectiveness of different cash transfer modalities in a low-income setting.
- To inform social welfare programming in sub-Saharan Africa.
Main Methods:
- A matched, cluster-randomised controlled trial was conducted in ten sites in Manicaland, Zimbabwe.
- Households were randomly assigned to UCT, CCT, or control groups.
- Primary endpoints included birth certificate possession, vaccination coverage, and school attendance rates for children.
Main Results:
- Conditional cash transfers (CCTs) significantly increased birth registration by 16.4% compared to control.
- Both UCTs and CCTs showed a positive trend in increasing school attendance (7.2% and 7.6% respectively).
- No significant differences were observed in vaccination uptake between the groups.
Conclusions:
- Cash transfer programs can be integrated into social welfare systems in sub-Saharan Africa.
- Further research is needed to determine the comparative effectiveness of UCTs and CCTs in the region.
- Findings support the use of cash transfers to enhance child welfare indicators.
Background:
Cash-transfer programmes can improve the wellbeing of vulnerable children, but few studies have rigorously assessed their effectiveness in sub-Saharan Africa. We investigated the effects of unconditional cash transfers (UCTs) and conditional cash transfers (CCTs) on birth registration, vaccination uptake, and school attendance in children in Zimbabwe.
Methods:
We did a matched, cluster-randomised controlled trial in ten sites in Manicaland, Zimbabwe. We divided each study site into three clusters. After a baseline survey between July, and September, 2009, clusters in each site were randomly assigned to UCT, CCT, or control, by drawing of lots from a hat. Eligible households contained children younger than 18 years and satisfied at least one other criteria: head of household was younger than 18 years; household cared for at least one orphan younger than 18 years, a disabled person, or an individual who was chronically ill; or household was in poorest wealth quintile. Between January, 2010, and January, 2011, households in UCT clusters collected payments every 2 months. Households in CCT clusters could receive the same amount but were monitored for compliance with several conditions related to child wellbeing. Eligible households in all clusters, including control clusters, had access to parenting skills classes and received maize seed and fertiliser in December, 2009, and August, 2010. Households and individuals delivering the intervention were not masked, but data analysts were. The primary endpoints were proportion of children younger than 5 years with a birth certificate, proportion younger than 5 years with up-to-date vaccinations, and proportion aged 6-12 years attending school at least 80% of the time. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00966849.
Findings:
1199 eligible households were allocated to the control group, 1525 to the UCT group, and 1319 to the CCT group. Compared with control clusters, the proportion of children aged 0-4 years with birth certificates had increased by 1·5% (95% CI -7·1 to 10·1) in the UCT group and by 16·4% (7·8-25·0) in the CCT group by the end of the intervention period. The proportions of children aged 0-4 years with complete vaccination records was 3·1% (-3·8 to 9·9) greater in the UCT group and 1·8% (-5·0 to 8·7) greater in the CCT group than in the control group. The proportions of children aged 6-12 years who attended school at least 80% of the time was 7·2% (0·8-13·7) higher in the UCT group and 7·6% (1·2-14·1) in the CCT group than in the control group.
Interpretation:
Our results support strategies to integrate cash transfers into social welfare programming in sub-Saharan Africa, but further evidence is needed for the comparative effectiveness of UCT and CCT programmes in this region.
Funding:
Wellcome Trust, the World Bank through the Partnership for Child Development, and the Programme of Support for the Zimbabwe National Action Plan for Orphans and Vulnerable Children.
Related Concept Videos
Cochran's Q Test
Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is limited...
What is an Experiment?
Chi-square Analysis
The chi-square test was developed by Pearson in 1990.
The first step of performing a Chi-square analysis is to establish a null hypothesis, which assumes that there is no real...
