Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 13, 2026

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
Published on: January 19, 2019
Human cooperation by lethal group competition
Martijn Egas1, Ralph Kats, Xander van der Sar
1Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, Section Population Biology, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, POBox 94248, 1090 GE Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Egas@uva.nl
Abstract:
Why humans are prone to cooperate puzzles biologists, psychologists and economists alike. Between-group conflict has been hypothesized to drive within-group cooperation. However, such conflicts did not have lasting effects in laboratory experiments, because they were about luxury goods, not needed for survival ("looting"). Here, we find within-group cooperation to last when between-group conflict is implemented as "all-out war" (eliminating the weakest groups). Human subjects invested in helping group members to avoid having the lowest collective pay-off, whereas they failed to cooperate in control treatments with random group elimination or with no subdivision in groups. When the game was repeated, experience was found to promote helping. Thus, not within-group interactions alone, not random group elimination, but pay-off-dependent group elimination was found to drive within-group cooperation in our experiment. We suggest that some forms of human cooperation are maintained by multi-level selection: reciprocity within groups and lethal competition among groups acting together.
Related Concept Videos
Robbers Cave
Competition
Aggression
The Stanford Prison Experiment
Impact of Groups on Groups
Inclusive Fitness

