Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 13, 2026
Individualized Stem-positioning in Calcar-guided Short-stem Total Hip Arthroplasty
Published on: February 27, 2018
Validation of the femoral component placement during hip resurfacing: a comparison between the conventional jig,
Makoto Kitada1, Takashi Sakai, Tsuyoshi Murase
1Center of Arthroplasty, Kyowakai-Hospital, Osaka, Japan. m-kitada@umin.net
Background:
Appropriate insertion of a femoral guidewire is essential for hip resurfacing. A simulation study was planned using synthetic femoral bone models and the accuracy and precision of femoral guidewire alignment and insertion point were compared between conventional jigs, patient-specific templates, and computed tomography (CT) based navigation techniques.
Methods:
Anteversion, stem-shaft angle, and the three-dimensional insertion point were measured postoperative with CT. Errors between planned and postoperative measurement and precision were evaluated.
Results:
There were no statistically significant differences in error for anteversion or insertion point, although the mechanical jig showed greater error in the stem-shaft angle than the others. Patient-specific template and CT-based navigation showed good precision with high intraclass correlation (ICC) (template, 0.908 to 1.000; navigation, 0.929 to 0.995) and small root mean square error (RMSE) (0.954 to 2.969; 1.468 to 3.213). The mechanical jig group performance was inferior to the others.
Conclusions:
Patient-specific templates and CT-based navigation had good accuracy and precision. The mechanical jig technique was inferior to the others.
