Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring

Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring

Blood pressure monitoring is a crucial clinical procedure in diagnosing and managing various cardiovascular conditions. Despite its significance, the accuracy of blood pressure measurements can be compromised by multiple factors, potentially leading to either falsely high or low readings. These inaccuracies are critical as they can significantly impact patient care. So, it is vital to understand these challenges deeply and adopt strategic approaches to minimize errors.
Several factors...

Errors in Taping

Errors in Taping

Errors in taping arise from multiple factors that can significantly impact measurement accuracy in surveying. Misalignment of the tape, often due to human error, is one primary source. A skilled rear tapeman, using a telescope, can help correct alignment by guiding the head tapeman; however, human limitations still lead to small inaccuracies. These errors may include misplacement of pins or inaccurate tape readings due to common visual confusions, such as mistaking a six for a nine. Such...

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...

Random and Systematic Errors

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...

Random and Systematic Errors

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

AI-enhanced Mammography With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection: Clinical Value and Comparison With Human Performance.

Radiology. Imaging cancer·2024

Same author

A spiculated mass target model for clinical image quality control in digital mammography.

The British journal of radiology·2024

Same author

Technical note: Realization and uncertainty analysis for an adjustable 3D structured breast phantom in digital breast tomosynthesis.

Medical physics·2023

Same author

Realistic 3D printed CT imaging tumor phantoms for validation of image processing algorithms.

Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB)·2022

Same author

X-ray attenuation of bone, soft and adipose tissue in CT from 70 to 140 kV and comparison with 3D printable additive manufacturing materials.

Scientific reports·2022

Same author

Technical note: A PET/MR coil with an integrated, orbiting 511 keV transmission source for PET/MR imaging validated in an animal study.

Medical physics·2022

Same journal

VIVIE: Virtually Integrated Ventricular Intervention Environment and its effectiveness as a teaching and learning tool.

International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery·2026

Same journal

Contactless robotic system for linear catheter advancement using magnetic actuation.

International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery·2026

Same journal

Sound source localization for spatial mapping of surgical actions in dynamic scenes.

International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery·2026

Same journal

ESD-VesNet: uncertainty-aware vessel segmentation network for endoscopic submucosal dissection with hard negative mining.

International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery·2026

Same journal

Lean Unet: a compact model for image segmentation.

International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery·2026

Same journal

Strain alignment: toward assessing mechanical plausibility of predicted displacement fields.

International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 13, 2026

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

Published on: January 17, 2013

An error analysis perspective for patient alignment systems.

Michael Figl¹, Marcus Kaar, Rainer Hoffman

¹Vienna General Hospital, Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 , Vienna, Austria.

International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery

|March 7, 2013

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study analyzed patient positioning system errors, finding that while error propagation models align with phantom data, they underestimate real-world inaccuracies like human influence and tissue deformation. These insights aid in optimizing computer-guided system accuracy.

More Related Videos

Four-Dimensional CT Analysis Using Sequential 3D-3D Registration

Four-Dimensional CT Analysis Using Sequential 3D-3D Registration

Published on: November 23, 2019

Robotized Testing of Camera Positions to Determine Ideal Configuration for Stereo 3D Visualization of Open-Heart Surgery

Robotized Testing of Camera Positions to Determine Ideal Configuration for Stereo 3D Visualization of Open-Heart Surgery

Published on: August 12, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 13, 2026

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

Published on: January 17, 2013

Four-Dimensional CT Analysis Using Sequential 3D-3D Registration

Four-Dimensional CT Analysis Using Sequential 3D-3D Registration

Published on: November 23, 2019

Robotized Testing of Camera Positions to Determine Ideal Configuration for Stereo 3D Visualization of Open-Heart Surgery

Robotized Testing of Camera Positions to Determine Ideal Configuration for Stereo 3D Visualization of Open-Heart Surgery

Published on: August 12, 2021

Area of Science:

Medical Imaging
Surgical Navigation
Biomedical Engineering

Background:

Patient positioning systems are crucial for accurate image-guided interventions.
Understanding error sources is vital for improving system precision.

Purpose of the Study:

To analyze error components in patient alignment systems, using an ultrasound (US) repositioning system as an example.
To apply findings to other navigation systems, including Cone Beam CT and Brainlab ExacTrac.

Main Methods:

Identified error sources and computed target registration errors.
Utilized error propagation calculations for registration, calibration, and tracking errors.
Evaluated image-to-image registration errors using a phantom study with different image metrics.

Main Results:

Error propagation analysis results closely matched phantom study data.
Patient evaluation results were significantly higher, suggesting underestimation of human factors (e.g., US scan head positioning) and tissue deformation.
Tracking system rotational errors can amplify positioning inaccuracies.

Conclusions:

Successfully analyzed overall error components in a typical patient positioning system.
Provided insights for optimizing positioning accuracy in computer-guided systems.