Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 13, 2026

Necropsy-based Wild Fish Health Assessment
Published on: September 11, 2018
Different roles and viewpoints of scientific experts in advising on environmental health risks
Pita Spruijt1, Anne B Knol, René Torenvlied
1Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Centre for Environmental Health, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Abstract:
Environmental health risks are often complex, largescale, and uncertain. The uncertainties inherent in these problems permit differences among experts in the appraisal of risks. This raises the question of whether different expert roles exist and, if so, how this affects the policy advice that is given. Here, we present a pilot study of the different roles and viewpoints that can be discerned among scientific experts in the Netherlands. Q methodology was used to empirically explore existing theoretical treatises on different expert roles. In total, 26 electromagnetic field (EMF) experts and 21 particulate matter (PM) experts participated. The responses were analyzed separately for EMF and PM respondents using Q factor analysis. In both the EMF and PM domain, three different expert roles were identified. This suggests that particular expert roles depend on the specific environmental health risk. The results indicate that different expert roles exist among scientists who provide policy advice on environmental health risks. This empirical study adds new data and insights to the literature on expert roles. The results of this study are relevant for the selection and composition of expert committees and the interpretation of expert advice.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Dimensions of Health and Illness
Types of Toxins
Air pollutants, primarily gases, pose significant threats to respiratory health, leading to conditions like hypoxia, lung cancer, and in extreme cases, death.
Environmental pollutants like...
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Drug Control Governance: Regulatory Bodies and Their Impact
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...

