Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 13, 2026

Surgical Swine Model of Chronic Cardiac Ischemia Treated by Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Published on: March 27, 2018
Current status of surgical ventricular restoration for ischemic cardiomyopathy
Hisayoshi Suma1, Anelechi C Anyanwu
1Suma Heart Clinic, Tokyo, Japan. suma@sumaheart.jp
Insights
Surgical ventricular restoration (SVR) may effectively treat ischemic cardiomyopathy, despite mixed trial results. Optimal patient selection and achieving >30% volume reduction are key for SVR success.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
- Medical Research
Background:
- Observational studies over 30 years supported surgical ventricular restoration (SVR) for ischemic cardiomyopathy.
- The 2009 Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure (STICH) trial reported no added benefit of SVR to coronary artery bypass surgery, reducing interest in the procedure.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the historical evidence and observational data supporting SVR.
- To critically analyze the STICH trial's limitations and its impact on SVR's perceived efficacy.
- To discuss post-STICH findings and future directions for SVR research.
Main Methods:
- Review of historical observational studies on SVR.
- Critical analysis of the STICH trial methodology and patient selection.
- Synthesis of findings from post-STICH publications evaluating SVR outcomes.
Main Results:
- Observational data and some post-STICH studies suggest SVR is effective in dilated ventricles.
- The STICH trial's conclusions are questioned due to suboptimal patient selection and inadequate volume reduction (19% mean).
- SVR appears effective when >30% ventricular volume reduction is achieved.
Conclusions:
- The STICH trial's limitations prevent definitive conclusions about SVR's role.
- SVR may be a viable treatment for specific ischemic cardiomyopathy patients, particularly with significant volume reduction.
- Continued research and data analysis are crucial to clarify SVR indications and optimize its future application.
Abstract:
Over the past 3 decades, several observational studies established a role for surgical ventricular restoration (SVR) in the treatment of ischemic cardiomyopathy. In 2009, the Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure (STICH) trial reported their findings and found no benefit of adding SVR to coronary artery bypass surgery in ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. The STICH findings precipitated a decline in interest in SVR. In this article, we review the historical background and observational data that established a role for SVR. We critically review the STICH trial, and contend that the limitations are such that the study cannot provide any reliable conclusion on the role of SVR because of suboptimal patient selection and inadequacy of volume reduction (only 19% mean reduction in volume). Several post-STICH publications continue to demonstrate that SVR is effective in dilated ventricles, provided the procedure achieves >30% volume reduction. It is critical that surgeons continue their work in SVR, and continue to analyze their data, to enable better clarification of the indications and future role for this procedure.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

