What have we learned from CONTRAST?

Ira M Mostovaya1, Peter J Blankestijn,

  • 1Department of Nephrology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. I.M.Mostovaya@umcutrecht.nl

Blood Purification
|March 8, 2013
PubMed

Insights

The CONvective TRAnsport STudy (CONTRAST) found that on-line postdilution hemodiafiltration did not reduce mortality or cardiovascular events compared to low-flux hemodialysis. This review covers CONTRAST

Area of Science:

  • Nephrology
  • Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • End-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients require renal replacement therapy.
  • Hemodialysis is a common treatment, but cardiovascular complications remain high.
  • Hemodiafiltration is an alternative treatment modality with theoretical benefits.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and discuss knowledge from the CONvective TRAnsport STudy (CONTRAST) trial.
  • To evaluate the efficacy of on-line postdilution hemodiafiltration versus low-flux hemodialysis.
  • To analyze mortality and cardiovascular outcomes in ESRD patients.

Main Methods:

  • The CONvective TRAnsport STudy (CONTRAST) was a large randomized controlled trial.
  • It compared on-line postdilution hemodiafiltration with low-flux hemodialysis.
  • The review synthesizes data on mortality, cardiovascular events, and subgroup analyses.

Main Results:

  • CONTRAST did not demonstrate a significant reduction in mortality with hemodiafiltration.
  • Cardiovascular events were not significantly different between the two treatment groups.
  • Subgroup analyses provided further insights into treatment effects.

Conclusions:

  • On-line postdilution hemodiafiltration did not show superiority over low-flux hemodialysis for major adverse outcomes in the CONTRAST trial.
  • The findings contribute to understanding the role of hemodiafiltration in ESRD management.
  • Further research may explore specific patient populations or alternative hemodiafiltration techniques.

Related Concept Videos

Phase Contrast and Differential Interference Contrast Microscopy01:26

Phase Contrast and Differential Interference Contrast Microscopy

Phase-Contrast Microscopes
In-phase-contrast microscopes, interference between light directly passing through a cell and light refracted by cellular components is used to create high-contrast, high-resolution images without staining. It is the oldest and simplest type of microscope that creates an image by altering the wavelengths of light rays passing through the specimen. Altered wavelength paths are created using an annular stop in the condenser. The annular stop produces a hollow cone of...
Real-World Application of Classical Conditioning01:15

Real-World Application of Classical Conditioning

Classical conditioning not only includes the initial pairing of stimuli but also extends to more complex forms, such as higher-order conditioning. Higher-order conditioning involves creating associations beyond the primary conditioned stimulus, resulting in a chain of conditioned responses.
Higher-order, or second-order, conditioning occurs when a neutral stimulus becomes associated with an already established conditioned stimulus through repeated pairings. For instance, if a dog has been...
Crossover Experiments01:16

Crossover Experiments

Crossover experiments, also called the repeated-measurements design, is a study design in which all experimental units are exposed to all treatments in different periods. Crossover experiments are generally used in psychology, the pharmaceutical industry, agriculture, and medicine.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...