Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 13, 2026

The WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 28, 2012
A new era of oral anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation: implications in clinical practice
Charalampos Kasmeridis1, Gregory Y Lip, Stavros Apostolakis
1University of Birmingham Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences, Birmingham, UK.
Abstract:
For > 50 years, vitamin K antagonists were the only available oral drugs for the prevention of thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation. Recently, new oral anticoagulants (the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran and the direct activated factor X (factor Xa) inhibitors rivaroxaban and apixaban) have completed phase 3 clinical trials for the same indications. The direct factor Xa inhibitor apixaban was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in December 2012. In this article, we provide a comprehensive assessment of the safety and efficacy of the new oral anticoagulants. We focus primarily on the balance between thromboembolic and hemorrhagic risk and the implications of such risks in clinical practice. Bleeding and thromboembolic risk estimation tools and their roles in the correct utilization of new oral anticoagulation are also discussed.
Insights
New oral anticoagulants offer alternatives to warfarin for preventing blood clots in atrial fibrillation. This review assesses their safety, efficacy, and risk management for clinical use.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacology and Therapeutics
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Hematology
Background:
- Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) were the sole oral anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation (AF) thromboembolism prevention for over 50 years.
- Recent advancements include new oral anticoagulants (NOACs): direct thrombin inhibitor (dabigatran) and direct factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban, apixaban).
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide a comprehensive assessment of the safety and efficacy of novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs).
- To analyze the balance between thromboembolic and bleeding risks associated with NOACs.
- To discuss the clinical implications and utilization of risk estimation tools for NOACs in practice.
Main Methods:
- Review of phase 3 clinical trial data for dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban.
- Analysis of safety and efficacy endpoints, focusing on thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events.
- Evaluation of risk stratification tools for guiding NOAC therapy.
Main Results:
- NOACs have demonstrated comparable or improved efficacy in preventing thromboembolism compared to VKAs.
- The safety profile of NOACs, particularly regarding major bleeding, is a key consideration.
- Apixaban, a direct factor Xa inhibitor, received FDA approval in December 2012.
Conclusions:
- NOACs represent a significant advancement in oral anticoagulation for AF patients.
- Careful consideration of the benefit-risk profile, including bleeding and thromboembolic risks, is crucial for optimal patient management.
- Risk assessment tools are important for the appropriate selection and utilization of NOACs in clinical practice.
Related Concept Videos
Anticoagulant Drugs: Vitamin K Antagonists and Direct Oral Anticoagulants
Warfarin, a prominent vitamin K antagonist family member, exerts its effect by inhibiting the enzyme VKORC1 (vitamin K epoxide reductase complex 1). By hindering this enzyme, warfarin...
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
