Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 13, 2026

Database-guided Flow-cytometry for Evaluation of Bone Marrow Myeloid Cell Maturation
Published on: November 3, 2018
Problems and pitfalls regarding WHO-defined diagnosis of early/prefibrotic primary myelofibrosis versus essential
T Barbui1, J Thiele, A M Vannucchi
1Department of Hematology, Ospedali Riuniti di Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy.
Abstract:
Reproducibility and clinical usefulness of the WHO classification of chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) persist to be a controversial issue. Major arguments are focused on the critical impact of histopathology, particularly concerning the distinction between essential thrombocythemia (ET) versus early/prefibrotic primary myelofibrosis (PMF). Regarding bone marrow morphology, WHO guidelines strictly require the recognition of characteristic histological patterns based on standardized features and a consensus of clinical and molecular-genetic data. Molecular-genetic findings as JAK2V617F, may aid to exclude reactive thrombocytosis, although in ET and PMF only 50-60% of the cases show these aberrations. Considerable doubts over the existence of early/prefibrotic PMF have been expressed with the consequence to include this entity in the ET category. On the other hand, it has to be argued that some of the critical studies failed to adhere very strictly to the WHO guidelines. Contrasting this situation, recently published retrospective and prospective clinico-pathological studies featuring the WHO criteria provided an important information on disease outcomes supporting the existence of early/prefibrotic PMF as a distinct clinico-pathologic entity in patients presenting clinically with ET. Therefore, this controversy suggests a scientific project, including the community of pathologists and hematologists, for providing sound, objective and reproducible criteria for diagnosing early/prefibrotic PMF.
Insights
The World Health Organization classification for chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) is debated, especially distinguishing essential thrombocythemia (ET) from early primary myelofibrosis (PMF). New research supports early PMF as a distinct entity, necessitating refined diagnostic criteria.
Area of Science:
- Hematology
- Oncology
- Pathology
Background:
- The World Health Organization (WHO) classification of chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) faces challenges in reproducibility and clinical utility.
- Distinguishing essential thrombocythemia (ET) from early/prefibrotic primary myelofibrosis (PMF) based on histopathology is a key area of controversy.
- Current WHO guidelines rely on specific bone marrow morphological features and integrated clinical-molecular data for diagnosis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To address the ongoing debate regarding the diagnostic criteria for MPNs, specifically the distinction between ET and early/prefibrotic PMF.
- To evaluate the clinical and pathological evidence supporting or refuting early/prefibrotic PMF as a distinct entity.
- To highlight the need for a collaborative scientific project to establish objective and reproducible diagnostic criteria.
Main Methods:
- Review and analysis of existing clinico-pathological studies adhering to WHO criteria.
- Evaluation of histopathological findings in bone marrow morphology.
- Consideration of molecular-genetic data, such as JAK2V617F mutations, in differential diagnosis.
Main Results:
- Some studies question the existence of early/prefibrotic PMF, suggesting its inclusion within the ET category.
- Critiques indicate that certain studies challenging early PMF did not strictly follow WHO diagnostic guidelines.
- Recent retrospective and prospective studies utilizing WHO criteria provide evidence supporting early/prefibrotic PMF as a distinct clinico-pathologic entity in patients presenting with ET.
Conclusions:
- The controversy surrounding early/prefibrotic PMF highlights limitations in current diagnostic approaches.
- Evidence suggests that early/prefibrotic PMF is a distinct entity, necessitating its recognition.
- A collaborative effort among pathologists and hematologists is crucial to develop robust, objective, and reproducible diagnostic criteria for early/prefibrotic PMF.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Types of Intermediate Filaments
Disorders of Hemostasis
Thromboembolic Disorders
Two factors primarily cause thromboembolic conditions.
Pulmonary Embolism I: Introduction

