Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 13, 2026

07:32
Measuring Maxillary Posterior Tooth Movement: A Model Assessment using Palatal and Dental Superimposition
Published on: February 23, 2024
Short-term change in occlusal function after using mandibular advancement appliance for snoring: a pilot study
Hiroshi Ueda1, Genki Watanabe, Atsushi Horihata
1Department of Orthodontics and Craniofacial Developmental Biology, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-Ku, Hiroshima 734-8553, Japan.
Sleep Disorders
|March 9, 2013
Summary
The two-piece mandibular advance appliance (MAA) shows fewer side effects on occlusal function and tooth pain compared to the one-piece MAA for snoring treatment. This suggests the two-piece MAA may be a superior option for managing snoring.
Area of Science:
- Dental Sleep Medicine
- Occlusal Function Analysis
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Snoring is a common issue often managed with mandibular advance appliances (MAAs).
- Different MAA designs may impact occlusal function and patient comfort differently.
- Understanding these effects is crucial for optimizing treatment outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effects of one-piece and two-piece MAAs on occlusal contact area (OCA), maximum bite force (MBF), center of occlusal load (COL), and tooth pain.
- To evaluate the duration of these effects after nocturnal MAA use.
- To determine which MAA design offers a better side effect profile.
Main Methods:
- Ten adult volunteers with mild snoring participated.
- Occlusal function (OCA, MBF, COL) and tooth pain (VAS) were measured at baseline and at intervals up to 120 minutes after MAA removal.
- Data were collected immediately, and 5, 15, 30, 60, and 120 minutes post-appliance removal.
Main Results:
- The two-piece MAA resulted in significantly larger OCA and MBF compared to the one-piece MAA at 5 minutes post-removal.
- The negative impact on COL and VAS pain scores resolved more quickly with the two-piece MAA.
- No significant differences were observed in the long-term effects between the two designs.
Conclusions:
- The two-piece MAA appears to be superior to the one-piece MAA regarding immediate side effects on occlusal function.
- The findings suggest that MAA design can influence the degree and duration of occlusal side effects.
- Further research with larger sample sizes may be warranted to confirm these findings.

