Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 13, 2026

Endoscopic Septoplasty with Limited Two-line Resection: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Septal Deviation
Published on: June 20, 2018
[The application of no nasal packing after functional endoscopic sinus surgery in type I and type II chronic
1Department of Puai Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430035, China.
Objective:
The subjective sensation of the patients and the treatment effect were compared prospectively between the no nasal packing group and the common nasal packing group.
Method:
The patients were divided into no nasal packing group and nasal packing group matched for the type of chronic sinusitis. All patients received operation of functional endoscopic sinus surgery. The patients of no nasal packing group were given thoroughly bleeding control without nasal packing, while the patients of nasal packing group received nasal packing with sponge after hemostatic seaweed covering of wound. The nasal stents in nasal packing group were removed two days after operation, and the other treatments were all identical in the two groups. The clinical symptoms and treatment effect were compared between the two groups using visual analog scale. The levels of headache, rhinalgia, nasal obstruction, bleeding and nasal secretions volume at different time points, such as 1 day, 2 days and 3 days after operation, were evaluated and compared, as well as the recovering of operative region, such as crustal, secretion, reaction film, mucosal edema, vesicle and blockage of the sinus ostium.
Result:
At the 1st day after operation, the degrees of headache, rhinalgia and nasal obstruction in the no nasal packing group were milder than the nasal packing group, and the differences have statistical significance. Two days after operation, the degrees of headache, rhinalgia and nasal obstruction, as well as the volume of bleeding and nasal secretions in the no nasal packing group were milder and lower than the nasal packing group, and the differences have statistical significance. Three days after operation, the differences of the indexes above were not statistically significant. The scores of total bleeding volume during the 3 days after operation showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Thirty-four patients were cured in no nasal packing group with the average epithelialization time of (10.7 +/- 2.6) weeks. Thirty-two patients were cured in nasal packing group with the average epithelialization time of (10.6 +/- 2.9) weeks. The difference of average epithelialization time between the two groups was not statistically significant.
Conclusion:
No nasal packing could relieve the discomfort caused by nasal packing and avoid the rebleeding and pain when removing the nasal stents. No nasal packing has obvious superiority than common nasal packing, and is effective in the treatment of depression. It is be appropriate for type I and type II chronic sinusitis patients without systemic disease with limited economic conditions.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Epistaxis
Etiology
Possible causes of this condition include high blood pressure, trauma, low humidity, upper respiratory tract infections, allergies, foreign bodies, nasal inhalation of corticosteroids or illicit drugs, excessive use of decongestant nasal sprays, facial or nasal surgery, anatomic malformation, tumors, or systemic...
Suctioning the Nasopharyngeal Airway
Equipment Required
Tonsillitis II: Management
Chronic Pharyngitis
Etiology
It often arises from persistent viral or bacterial infections affecting sinuses and tonsils.
Additional contributing factors include inadequate dental hygiene, mouth breathing, recurring tonsillitis, allergic rhinitis, laryngopharyngeal reflux, and exposure to smoke, chemicals, and other environmental pollutants. Allergic reactions to pollen, mold, and pet dander, chronic cough, excessive voice usage,...

