Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.

Guidelines and Strategies for Safe Computer Charting

Guidelines and Strategies for Safe Computer Charting

The guidelines and strategies provided by the American Nurses Association (ANA) and the Canadian Nurses Association (CNA) offer essential principles for ensuring safe and secure computer charting systems in healthcare settings. Let's break down each recommendation:
Maintain Confidentiality and Security:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Development of a core outcome set for clinical trials of extended reality for pain.

Pain reports·2026

Same author

On Friendship at Work.

Work (Reading, Mass.)·2026

Same author

Remembering matters.

Work (Reading, Mass.)·2026

Same author

Brave space for courageous inquiry.

Work (Reading, Mass.)·2026

Same author

Lessons from a lifetime love of Broadway.

Work (Reading, Mass.)·2026

Same author

Cultural Humility at Work: Lessons from World Federation of Occupational Therapists (WFOT) Congress.

Work (Reading, Mass.)·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 13, 2026

Assessing Working Memory in Children: The Comprehensive Assessment Battery for Children – Working Memory (CABC-WM)

Assessing Working Memory in Children: The Comprehensive Assessment Battery for Children – Working Memory (CABC-WM)

Published on: June 12, 2017

Reliability and concurrent validity of the computer workstation checklist.

Nancy A Baker¹, Heather Livengood, Karen Jacobs

¹Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. nab36@pitt.edu

Work (Reading, Mass.)

|March 13, 2013

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

The Computer Workstation Checklist (CWC) shows strong reliability for assessing workstation setup. However, it may underestimate problems, suggesting it's best used alongside professional ergonomic evaluations.

More Related Videos

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test (MSPT): An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test (MSPT): An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool

Published on: June 30, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 13, 2026

Assessing Working Memory in Children: The Comprehensive Assessment Battery for Children – Working Memory (CABC-WM)

Assessing Working Memory in Children: The Comprehensive Assessment Battery for Children – Working Memory (CABC-WM)

Published on: June 12, 2017

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test (MSPT): An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test (MSPT): An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool

Published on: June 30, 2014

Area of Science:

Occupational Health
Ergonomics
Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

Self-report checklists are commonly used for computer workstation assessment by untrained individuals.
Limited evaluation exists for the reliability and validity of many existing checklists.

Purpose of the Study:

To examine the reliability and validity of the Computer Workstation Checklist (CWC).
To identify discrepancies between worker self-reported workstation issues and expert evaluations.

Main Methods:

The CWC was administered at baseline and 1-month intervals to assess reliability.
Baseline CWC data was compared against expert onsite workstation evaluations to determine validity.

Main Results:

Reliability of the CWC ranged from 0.38 to 0.93 (prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted kappa), with high agreement on input devices, monitors, and document holders.
The CWC demonstrated higher specificity (11/16 items) than sensitivity (3/16 items).
Positive predictive values exceeded negative predictive values across all checklist items.

Conclusions:

The Computer Workstation Checklist exhibits strong reliability.
Workers frequently underreport workstation setup problems, as indicated by the CWC's sensitivity and specificity.
The CWC is likely not a standalone valid tool but can be a useful supplement to professional ergonomic assessments.