Retroperitoneal fibrosis: role of imaging in diagnosis and follow-up
Rafael Oliveira Caiafa1, Ana Sierra Vinuesa, Rafael Salvador Izquierdo
1CDI-Diagnostic Imaging Center, Hospital Clínic, Calle Villarroel 170, Barcelona 08036, Spain. ocrafael@yahoo.es
Abstract:
Retroperitoneal fibrosis (RPF) encompasses a range of diseases characterized by proliferation of aberrant fibroinflammatory tissue, which usually surrounds the infrarenal portion of the abdominal aorta, inferior vena cava, and iliac vessels. This process may extend to neighboring structures, frequently entrapping and obstructing the ureters and eventually leading to renal failure. The idiopathic form of RPF accounts for more than two-thirds of cases; the rest are secondary to factors such as drug use, malignancies, or infections. If promptly diagnosed and treated, idiopathic and most other benign forms of RPF have a good prognosis. In contrast, malignant RPF, which accounts for up to 10% of cases, has a poor prognosis. Therefore, the most important diagnostic challenge is differentiation of benign from malignant RPF. Imaging plays a key role in diagnosis of RPF. Cross-sectional imaging studies, particularly multidetector computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, are considered the imaging modalities of choice. Imaging features may help distinguish between benign and malignant RPF, but in some cases histopathologic examination of the retroperitoneal tissue is needed for definitive diagnosis. CT and MR imaging, along with positron emission tomography with fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose, also play an important role in management and follow-up of idiopathic RPF.
Insights
Retroperitoneal fibrosis (RPF) is a condition involving abnormal tissue growth around major abdominal vessels. Differentiating benign from malignant RPF using imaging is crucial for patient prognosis and treatment.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Oncology
- Nephrology
Background:
- Retroperitoneal fibrosis (RPF) involves fibroinflammatory tissue growth around abdominal vessels.
- RPF can obstruct ureters, leading to renal failure.
- Idiopathic RPF is common, but secondary causes include malignancy and infection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To highlight the diagnostic challenges in differentiating benign from malignant RPF.
- To emphasize the role of imaging in RPF diagnosis and management.
Main Methods:
- Review of imaging modalities for RPF diagnosis.
- Discussion of cross-sectional imaging techniques like CT and MR.
- Mention of histopathologic examination for definitive diagnosis.
Main Results:
- Imaging, particularly CT and MR, is key for RPF diagnosis.
- Imaging features can help distinguish benign from malignant RPF.
- Histopathology may be required for definitive diagnosis.
Conclusions:
- Accurate differentiation of benign and malignant RPF is critical due to differing prognoses.
- Imaging plays a vital role in the diagnosis, management, and follow-up of RPF.
- Multimodality imaging, including PET, aids in managing idiopathic RPF.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies V: Intravenous Urography and Retrograde Pyelography
Ultrasound II: Endoscopic Ultrasound and FibroScan
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS):
Imaging Studies VII: Vascular Imaging
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies II: Ultrasonography
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
