Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cis-regulatory Sequences02:02

Cis-regulatory Sequences

Cis-regulatory sequences are short fragments of non-coding DNA that are present on the same chromosomes as the genes that they regulate. These fragments serve as binding sites for transcriptional regulators, proteins that are responsible for controlling gene transcription and differential gene expression across cell types in eukaryotes. Cis-regulatory sequences can be close to the gene of interest or thousands of bases away in the DNA sequence; however, those sequences that are further away are...
Cis-regulatory Sequences02:02

Cis-regulatory Sequences

Cis-regulatory sequences are short fragments of non-coding DNA that are present on the same chromosomes as the genes that they regulate. These fragments serve as binding sites for transcriptional regulators, proteins that are responsible for controlling gene transcription and differential gene expression across cell types in eukaryotes. Cis-regulatory sequences can be close to the gene of interest or thousands of bases away in the DNA sequence; however, those sequences that are further away are...
Co-activators and Co-repressors02:04

Co-activators and Co-repressors

Gene transcription is regulated by the synergistic action of several proteins that form a complex at a gene regulatory site. This is observed in eukaryotes, where the regulation of gene expression is a complex process. Regulatory proteins in eukaryotes can broadly be classified into two types – regulators that bind directly to specific DNA sequences and co-regulators that associate with regulatory proteins but cannot directly bind to the DNA. These co-regulators are further divided into...
Co-activators and Co-repressors02:04

Co-activators and Co-repressors

Gene transcription is regulated by the synergistic action of several proteins that form a complex at a gene regulatory site. This is observed in eukaryotes, where the regulation of gene expression is a complex process. Regulatory proteins in eukaryotes can broadly be classified into two types – regulators that bind directly to specific DNA sequences and co-regulators that associate with regulatory proteins but cannot directly bind to the DNA. These co-regulators are further divided into...
Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators02:13

Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators

Transcriptional regulators bind to specific cis-regulatory sequences in the DNA to regulate gene transcription. These cis-regulatory sequences are very short, usually less than ten nucleotide pairs in length. The short length means that there is a high probability of the exact same sequence randomly occurring throughout the genome.  Since regulators can also bind to groups of similar sequences, this further increases the chances of random binding. Transcriptional regulators form dimers that...
Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators02:13

Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators

Transcriptional regulators bind to specific cis-regulatory sequences in the DNA to regulate gene transcription. These cis-regulatory sequences are very short, usually less than ten nucleotide pairs in length. The short length means that there is a high probability of the exact same sequence randomly occurring throughout the genome.  Since regulators can also bind to groups of similar sequences, this further increases the chances of random binding. Transcriptional regulators form dimers that...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Discovery of a novel <i>ITPR2::KRAS</i> fusion in large cell neuroendocrine lung cancer: a case report.

Translational lung cancer research·2026
Same author

Functional genomics analysis of developing zebrafish and human endoderm reveals highly conserved <i>cis</i>-regulatory modules acting during vertebrate organogenesis.

Genome research·2026
Same author

STAR (stroma-tumor AI risk) assessment: association of AI-derived tumor-stroma proportion with patient survival provides added prognostic value beyond KELIM in epithelial ovarian cancer.

BJC reports·2026
Same author

Unraveling the role of receptor-like protein tyrosine phosphatase PTPRH in cell signaling regulation and biological processes of non-small cell lung cancer.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Molecular and Functional Divergence of Zebrafish Sox Paralogs Controlling Endoderm Formation and Left-Right Patterning.

Genome biology and evolution·2025
Same author

SARS-CoV-2 infection drives local inflammation of the intestinal epithelium in immunocompromised patients with cancer.

iScience·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 13, 2026

Quantitative Comparison of cis-Regulatory Element (CRE) Activities in Transgenic Drosophila melanogaster
08:19

Quantitative Comparison of cis-Regulatory Element (CRE) Activities in Transgenic Drosophila melanogaster

Published on: December 19, 2011

Conserved non-coding elements and cis regulation: actions speak louder than words.

Andrew C Nelson1, Fiona C Wardle

  • 1Randall Division of Cell and Molecular Biophysics, New Hunt's House, King's College London, Guy's Campus, London SE1 1UL, UK. andrew.nelson@path.ox.ac.uk

Development (Cambridge, England)
|March 14, 2013
PubMed
Summary

Conserved non-coding sequences may not always regulate genes as widely assumed. Genome-scale studies reveal the actual in vivo function of these cis-regulatory elements across species and development.

More Related Videos

HOX Loci Focused CRISPR/sgRNA Library Screening Identifying Critical CTCF Boundaries
10:10

HOX Loci Focused CRISPR/sgRNA Library Screening Identifying Critical CTCF Boundaries

Published on: March 31, 2019

High-throughput Identification of Gene Regulatory Sequences Using Next-generation Sequencing of Circular Chromosome Conformation Capture (4C-seq)
09:06

High-throughput Identification of Gene Regulatory Sequences Using Next-generation Sequencing of Circular Chromosome Conformation Capture (4C-seq)

Published on: October 5, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 13, 2026

Quantitative Comparison of cis-Regulatory Element (CRE) Activities in Transgenic Drosophila melanogaster
08:19

Quantitative Comparison of cis-Regulatory Element (CRE) Activities in Transgenic Drosophila melanogaster

Published on: December 19, 2011

HOX Loci Focused CRISPR/sgRNA Library Screening Identifying Critical CTCF Boundaries
10:10

HOX Loci Focused CRISPR/sgRNA Library Screening Identifying Critical CTCF Boundaries

Published on: March 31, 2019

High-throughput Identification of Gene Regulatory Sequences Using Next-generation Sequencing of Circular Chromosome Conformation Capture (4C-seq)
09:06

High-throughput Identification of Gene Regulatory Sequences Using Next-generation Sequencing of Circular Chromosome Conformation Capture (4C-seq)

Published on: October 5, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Molecular Biology
  • Evolutionary Biology

Background:

  • Conserved non-coding genomic sequences are widely believed to regulate neighboring genes.
  • Reporter assays suggest these sequences drive gene expression, but in vivo endogenous function is less understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the endogenous function of conserved non-coding sequences in vivo.
  • To examine the species- and stage-specific gene regulation by these elements.
  • To explore the link between sequence conservation and functional cis-regulatory element use.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature.
  • Analysis of unbiased genome-scale approaches.
  • Examination of reporter expression data versus endogenous function.

Main Results:

  • Emerging evidence suggests conserved non-coding sequences may not universally or equivalently regulate gene expression across species or developmental stages.
  • Genome-scale approaches are crucial for understanding the true in vivo function of these elements.

Conclusions:

  • The assumption that all conserved non-coding sequences are functionally active cis-regulatory elements requires rigorous re-evaluation.
  • Genomic studies are essential for deciphering the relationship between sequence conservation and actual regulatory function.