Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 13, 2026
12:34
Collection, Isolation, and Flow Cytometric Analysis of Human Endocervical Samples
Published on: July 6, 2014
Satisfactory sampling in cytological cervical diagnosis: comparison between a conventional and a new sampling device
Ankica Lukic1, Stefania Iannaccio, Rosemarie Heyn
1Via Michele Amari 47, 00179 Roma, Italy. luki.anki@tin.it
Anticancer Research
|March 14, 2013
Summary
The PapCone® device provides better cervical cell collection than traditional methods, reducing misdiagnosis in cervical cancer screening. This new method collects more glandular cells and is easier to screen.
Area of Science:
- Gynecologic Oncology
- Cytopathology
- Medical Device Technology
Background:
- Inadequate cervical sampling is a primary cause of misdiagnosis in cervical cancer screening.
- Conventional methods using Ayre's spatula and cytobrush may not optimally collect all necessary cell types.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of the PapCone® device against conventional methods for collecting ectocervical and glandular cells.
- To evaluate qualitative and quantitative parameters of cell collection for cervical cancer screening.
Main Methods:
- 18 healthy women underwent ecto-endocervical sampling using both PapCone® and conventional methods at a three-month interval.
- Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analyzed the ultrastructure of sampling devices before and after use.
Main Results:
- PapCone® demonstrated a statistically significant improvement, yielding less cell overlap and fewer white blood cells (p<0.05).
- The PapCone® device collected a significantly higher number of metaplastic cells (p<0.01).
- SEM revealed PapCone®'s porous structure facilitates superior collection of glandular cells.
Conclusions:
- Cervical smears obtained with PapCone® were adequate and easier to screen compared to conventional methods.
- PapCone® shows potential to improve the accuracy and efficiency of cervical cancer screening.
