Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Expectancy models of alcohol use.

A W Stacy1, K F Widaman, G A Marlatt

  • 1Institute for Prevention Research, University of Southern California, Pasadena 91101.

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
|May 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

On Methods for Comparing Apples and Oranges.

Multivariate behavioral research·2016
Same author

Sample Size in Factor Analysis: The Role of Model Error.

Multivariate behavioral research·2016
Same author

Common Factor Analysis Versus Principal Component Analysis: Differential Bias in Representing Model Parameters?

Multivariate behavioral research·2016
Same author

Bias in Pattern Loadings Represented by Common Factor Analysis and Component Analysis.

Multivariate behavioral research·2016
Same author

A national study of Chinese youths' attitudes towards students with intellectual disabilities.

Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR·2011
Same author

Social perception in children with intellectual disabilities: the interpretation of benign and hostile intentions.

Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR·2010

This study validates alcohol expectancy models over attitude models by addressing methodological issues and confirming expectancy constructs

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Behavioral Science
  • Substance Use Research

Background:

  • Understanding the psychological underpinnings of alcohol use is crucial for developing effective interventions.
  • Existing research often compares expectancy models with attitude models, but methodological limitations can obscure true theoretical differences.
  • Self-report biases and the generalizability of expectancy constructs require careful examination.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To rigorously compare expectancy models against competing attitude models of alcohol use.
  • To address and mitigate methodological issues within expectancy research.
  • To evaluate the discriminant validity and predictive power of expectancy and attitude constructs.

Main Methods:

  • Study 1: Assessed the impact of self-report biases on associations between expectancy constructs and alcohol use.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Studies 2 & 3: Investigated the distinction between positive and negative alcohol expectancies using cross-sectional and prospective designs.
  • Study 3: Directly evaluated competing predictions from expectancy and attitude theories.

    • Main Results:

    • Expectancy constructs demonstrated strong discriminant validity and were free from significant self-report bias.
    • Positive and negative alcohol expectancies were distinct and differentially predicted alcohol use.
    • Findings supported expectancy models, showing they offered superior prediction of alcohol use compared to attitude models.

    Conclusions:

    • The expectancy framework provides a valid and useful approach to understanding alcohol use.
    • Methodological rigor is essential for accurately comparing theoretical models of substance use.
    • Expectancy constructs possess unique predictive utility beyond general attitudes.