Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
Blinding01:11

Blinding

Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to subjects...
Blind Procedures02:07

Blind Procedures

Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which child was...
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities I01:27

Nurses' Legal Responsibilities I

In healthcare, informed consent is a crucial process that involves thoroughly communicating medical treatment options to patients, including benefits, risks, potential side effects, and alternatives. This process enables patients to make well-informed decisions about their care, ensuring they understand the implications of their choices before consenting to or refusing treatment.
The legal responsibilities of a nurse regarding informed consent include the following:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Greater recalled pain and movement-evoked pain are associated with longer 400-m walk and repeat stair climb timein older adults: the study of muscle, mobility, and aging.

GeroScience·2026
Same author

Addressing pancreatic cancer disparities in Oregon's Native American population via tribally responsive research systems with the confederated tribes of warm springs.

Cancer causes & control : CCC·2026
Same author

Supporting Students with Migraine: Examining Current Practices and Identifying Strategies for Educational Success.

Current pain and headache reports·2025
Same author

Addressing Pancreatic Cancer Disparities in Oregon's Native American Population via Tribally Responsive Research Systems with The Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs.

Research square·2025
Same author

Greater recalled pain and movement-evoked pain are associated with longer 400-meter walk and repeat stair climb time: the Study of Muscle, Mobility and Aging.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2024
Same author

American Headache Society white paper on treatment of post-traumatic headache from concussion in youth.

Headache·2024
Same journal

Thymidylate synthase inhibitory drugs induce p53-dependent pathways differently.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Top-down and bottom-up attention for joint pattern classification and reconstruction.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Short- and long-term scaling behavior of blood pressure and pulse arrival time during sleep in healthy controls and patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Double DQN-based secrecy energy efficiency and fairness performance in IRS-assisted NOMA systems with friendly jamming.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

10 recommendations for strengthening citizen science for improved societal and ecological outcomes: A co-produced analysis of challenges and opportunities in the 21st century.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Paying in public: Peer effects, impression management, and willingness to pay on digital payment platforms.

PloS one·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 13, 2026

E-Patient Counseling Trial (E-PACO): Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
06:28

E-Patient Counseling Trial (E-PACO): Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

Published on: August 1, 2019

Interactive informed consent: randomized comparison with paper consents.

Michael C Rowbotham1, John Astin, Kaitlin Greene

  • 1California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute, San Francisco, California, USA. rowbotm@cpmcri.org

Plos One
|March 14, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Interactive consent forms on tablets significantly improve patient understanding of research studies compared to traditional paper forms. This digital approach enhances comprehension and engagement, crucial for informed consent in clinical research.

More Related Videos

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research
07:48

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research

Published on: November 26, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 13, 2026

E-Patient Counseling Trial (E-PACO): Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
06:28

E-Patient Counseling Trial (E-PACO): Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

Published on: August 1, 2019

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research
07:48

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research

Published on: November 26, 2015

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Research Ethics
  • Human Subject Protection
  • Health Informatics

Background:

  • Informed consent is vital for protecting human research participants.
  • Current paper-based informed consent often leads to poor subject comprehension of study details, risks, and rights.
  • Lack of comprehension verification is a significant gap in current informed consent processes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the effectiveness of an interactive, tablet-based informed consent process versus a traditional paper-based process.
  • To assess participant comprehension of study information, procedures, and risks.
  • To evaluate participant satisfaction and engagement with different consent modalities.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective randomized study involving clinical research professionals and diverse patient populations.
  • Comparison between IRB-approved paper informed consent forms (ICF) and an interactive iPad presentation (video, form, quiz).
  • Comprehension assessed via online testing 24-36 hours post-session; satisfaction and time spent were also recorded.

Main Results:

  • Patients using the interactive iPad consent achieved significantly higher test scores (75%) compared to paper consent (58%, p < .001).
  • A trend towards better scores was observed in research professionals using the iPad (77% vs 57%, p = .07).
  • The interactive iPad method took longer (22.7 min) than paper (13.2 min) but showed higher overall satisfaction and enjoyment.

Conclusions:

  • Interactive, tablet-based informed consent systems significantly improve participant comprehension of clinical research studies.
  • This digital approach, incorporating video and quizzes, enhances understanding of procedures and risks.
  • The findings support the adoption of interactive digital tools to strengthen the informed consent process in research.