Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 13, 2026

Oral Biofilm Formation on Different Materials for Dental Implants
Published on: June 24, 2018
Active tactile sensibility of single-tooth implants versus natural dentition: a split-mouth double-blind randomized
Mahmoud Kazemi1, Farideh Geramipanah, Ramin Negahdari
1Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Center for Implant Research, Faculty of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Background:
Unlike passive sensitivity of implants/teeth that is assessed more, only three controversial studies have compared active tactile sensibility (ATS) of implants and teeth.
Purpose:
We aimed to explore the difference between the ATS of teeth and single-tooth implants.
Methods:
The ATS of single-tooth implants and contralateral teeth was measured in 25 patients after they bit on gold and placebo foils 0- to 70-μm thick, each for five times, in a random order blinded to patients and assessor, carried out at two sessions. Based on the experimental range of 0 μm (mock trials) to 70 μm, the sigmoid shape of psychometric curve was estimated to locate the 50% values as the ATS thresholds for each tooth or implant. ATS Data were analyzed using paired and unpaired t-tests and multiple linear regression (α = 0.05, β ≤ 0.1). Also, equivalence testing approach was used to assess semi-objectively the clinical significance.
Results:
Average ATS values for teeth and implants were 21.4 ± 6.55 μm and 30.0 ± 7.55 μm, respectively (p = .0001 [paired t-test]). None of the geometric characteristics of implants nor duration of implant in function were correlated with the ATS (p > .4 [regression]). Age was positively associated with the ATS of both implants and teeth (p ≤ .019 [regression]). Tooth ATS (but not implant ATS) was significantly higher in males compared with females (p = .050 [unpaired t-test]), which contributed to a generalizable tooth-implant difference higher than 8-μm clinical equivalence margin in females. The ATS was not significantly different between arches or between anterior/posterior regions (p > .6).
Conclusion:
There was a slight but statistically significant difference between implant and tooth tactile sensitivities.