Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Maximum likelihood estimation of reference centiles.

M L Thompson1, G B Theron

  • 1Institute of Biostatistics, Medical Research Council, Tygerberg, South Africa.

Statistics in Medicine
|May 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Predicting reamputation risk in patients undergoing lower extremity amputation due to the complications of peripheral artery disease and/or diabetes.

The British journal of surgery·2019
Same author

Mortality prediction following non-traumatic amputation of the lower extremity.

The British journal of surgery·2019
Same author

A retrospective time trend study of firearm and non-firearm homicide in Cape Town from 1994 to 2013.

South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde·2018
Same author

Systematic reanalysis of genomic data improves quality of variant interpretation.

Clinical genetics·2018
Same author

Recent trends in testosterone testing, low testosterone levels, and testosterone treatment among Veterans.

Andrology·2015
Same author

Weight loss intention, dietary behaviors, and barriers to dietary change in veterans with lower extremity amputations.

Disability and health journal·2015
Same journal

A Mixture of Distributed Lag Non-Linear Models to Account for Spatially Heterogeneous Exposure-Lag-Response Associations.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Practical Considerations for Gaussian Process Modeling for Causal Inference in Quasi-Experimental Studies With Panel Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Covariate Adjustment for Wilcoxon Two Sample Statistic and Test.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Beyond Fixed Thresholds: Optimizing Summaries of Wearable Device Data via Piecewise Linearization of Quantile Functions.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

A Causal Framework for Evaluating the Total Effect of Strategies Aiming to Expand Screening and to Improve Outcomes.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Causal Effects on Nonterminal Event Time With Application to Antibiotic Usage and Future Resistance.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces maximum likelihood estimation for precise centile estimates, outperforming non-parametric methods. This approach effectively handles complex data, including longitudinal and cross-sectional datasets, for accurate statistical analysis.

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Biostatistics
  • Medical Statistics

Background:

  • Centile estimation is crucial for interpreting health data, but traditional methods can lack precision.
  • Non-parametric methods are common but may not fully leverage data structure, especially with longitudinal or complex datasets.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and evaluate a maximum likelihood-based approach for centile estimation.
  • To demonstrate the advantages of this method over non-parametric techniques for both cross-sectional and longitudinal data.
  • To showcase the flexibility of the method in handling missing data and unequally spaced records.

Main Methods:

  • Fitting appropriate probability density functions using maximum likelihood estimation.
  • Simultaneously fitting densities to multiple cross-sections with constraints (e.g., smoothness) for longitudinal data.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilizing the Johnson family of densities for practical application.

    • Main Results:

    • Maximum likelihood centile estimates are generally more precise than non-parametric estimates for cross-sectional data.
    • The method accommodates longitudinal data, allowing simultaneous density fitting across time points.
    • Variances of estimates are readily obtained, and missing/unequally spaced data are easily handled.

    Conclusions:

    • Maximum likelihood estimation provides a robust and precise framework for centile estimation.
    • This approach offers significant advantages for analyzing complex health-related datasets, including longitudinal studies.
    • The method is adaptable and efficient for various data structures encountered in medical research.