Review on natriuretic peptides: where we are, where we are going

Tremendous advances have been made in our understanding of the pathophysiology and treatment of congestive heart failure. However, diagnosis of the disease still remains difficult, even with a comprehensive physical examination. Symptoms such as dyspnea are nonspecific and insensitive indicators for heart failure, which can go largely undetected. Several studies have suggested the need for new diagnostic capabilities, especially with the increasing prevalence of heart failure in the US. The discovery of natriuretic peptides as diagnostic biomarkers has been one of the most critical advances for the management of heart failure. Both B-type natriuretic peptide and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide have the potential to diagnose heart failure, assess prognostic risk of rehospitalization and mortality, and even help guide treatment. Their relative cost-effectiveness and availability have also facilitated their acceptance into many emergency departments, clinics and in-patient units as standard care when evaluating patients with suspected heart failure. Our understanding of the natriuretic peptide system is still in its infancy, but natriuretic peptides have emerged as important diagnostic and prognostic tools that have generated interest in finding broader applications for their use.

The purpose of this review is to discuss the clinical approaches and future applications of natriuretic peptides in diagnosing and managing treatment of congestive heart failure.

A comprehensive review of studies to assess the utility of natriuretic peptides for diagnosis and prognosis of heart failure and other conditions.

Natriuretic peptides are powerful tools to aid the physician in the diagnosis, prognosis and management of heart failure in both in-patient and out-patient settings. However, natriuretic peptides should be used as an adjunct test as many circumstances can also influence changes in natriuretic peptide levels.