Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation01:20

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning, patient...
Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting01:29

Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting

Documentation in long-term care facilities and home healthcare settings is crucial for ensuring continuous, coordinated, and comprehensive care for patients. Each setting has its specific documentation processes and tools:
Long-Term Care Facilities
Nursing Evaluation01:15

Nursing Evaluation

The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
Section...
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures01:22

Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures

Essential infection prevention measures are based on the knowledge of the infection chain, the modes of transmission in healthcare settings, and the use of the best practices in all healthcare settings. Compulsory public reporting of healthcare-associated infection rates is needed to allow individuals and the community to make informed choices regarding selecting a healthcare facility.
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System01:26

Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System

At the different levels of the healthcare system, we see varying methods of healthcare used. These methods include managed care systems, case management, and primary healthcare.
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is limited...
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation01:08

Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation

A successful patient outcome depends mainly on the evaluation stage of the nursing process. Evaluation determines effectiveness by reviewing what was done previously after the completion of nursing interventions. Every time a healthcare professional steps in or administers treatment, they must reassess or evaluate the action to ensure the intended result. During the evaluation phase, there are three probable patient outcomes:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Occupational exposure limits for psychosocial hazards: A promising concept or a premature leap?

Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health·2026
Same author

Interventions and Implementation Strategies for Preventing Occupational Contact Dermatitis: A Scoping Review.

Contact dermatitis·2026
Same author

A risk communication intervention aimed at enhancing help-seeking behavior and reducing stress symptoms in healthcare workers: a pilot study with a process evaluation.

BMC psychology·2025
Same author

Skin Barrier Biomarkers in Patch-Induced and Clinical Allergic and Irritant Contact Dermatitis.

Contact dermatitis·2025
Same author

Comparison of three multiplex immunoassays for biomarker analysis in stratum corneum tape strips.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Evaluation of an intervention to increase topical sunscreen use in German outdoor workers: study protocol for the non-randomised controlled intervention study ProtExSun.

BMJ open·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 13, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

Improving occupational health care for construction workers: a process evaluation.

Julitta S Boschman1, Henk F van der Molen, Judith K Sluiter

  • 1Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Department: Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, PO Box 22660, Amsterdam 1100, DE, the Netherlands. j.s.boschman@amc.nl

BMC Public Health
|March 19, 2013
PubMed
Summary

Job-specific workers' health surveillance (WHS) in construction showed acceptable implementation, but low reach and engagement limited its effectiveness. Workers reported increased knowledge and satisfaction, suggesting potential benefits for occupational health care.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 13, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

Area of Science:

  • Occupational Health
  • Public Health
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Construction workers face unique occupational health challenges.
  • Job-specific workers' health surveillance (WHS) aims to improve healthcare for this demographic.
  • Evaluating the implementation process of WHS is crucial for optimizing its effectiveness.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the implementation process of a job-specific workers' health surveillance (WHS) program.
  • To assess the effectiveness of WHS in improving occupational health care for construction workers.
  • To identify factors influencing the successful implementation of WHS.

Main Methods:

  • A process evaluation of job-specific WHS was conducted with 899 construction workers (bricklayers and supervisors).
  • Data collected via recruitment records and questionnaires assessed reach, intervention dose delivered/received, and fidelity.
  • Worker knowledge, satisfaction, and perceived effects were measured using a 0-10 scale.

Main Results:

  • Program implementation was deemed acceptable with an overall score of 58%.
  • Key challenges included low reach (9% attendance), limited fidelity (67%), and modest worker engagement.
  • Workers reported substantial increases in knowledge (7.0 for health status, 5.9 for work ability) and high satisfaction (7.5).

Conclusions:

  • The job-specific WHS program demonstrated acceptable implementation despite challenges.
  • Low reach, protocol adherence, and worker engagement significantly impacted the intervention process.
  • The intervention led to significant knowledge gains and high worker satisfaction, indicating potential for improved occupational health outcomes.