Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 13, 2026

12:09
Measuring Influenza Neutralizing Antibody Responses to A(H3N2) Viruses in Human Sera by Microneutralization Assays Using MDCK-SIAT1 Cells
Published on: November 22, 2017
The test-negative design for estimating influenza vaccine effectiveness
Michael L Jackson1, Jennifer C Nelson
1Group Health Research Institute. 1730 Minor Ave, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101-1448, United States. jackson.ml@ghc.org
Vaccine
|March 19, 2013
Summary
The test-negative design is a common method for estimating influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE). This study formally develops its methodology, highlighting assumptions and potential biases for accurate VE estimation.
Area of Science:
- Epidemiology
- Vaccinology
- Biostatistics
Background:
- The test-negative design is increasingly used for observational studies of influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE).
- Formal methodological development of this design has been lacking.
- Understanding its assumptions is crucial for accurate VE estimation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To formally develop the rationale and underlying assumptions of the test-negative study design for influenza VE.
- To identify conditions under which the test-negative design yields unbiased VE estimates.
- To compare the test-negative design with traditional methods like case-control and cohort studies.
Main Methods:
- The study defines the test-negative design where individuals seeking care for acute respiratory illness (ARI) are tested for influenza.
- VE is calculated as the ratio of vaccination odds in influenza-positive versus influenza-negative individuals.
- The derivation involves analyzing assumptions related to non-influenza ARI causes and healthcare-seeking behavior.
Main Results:
- The test-negative design can generalize VE estimates to the source population if non-influenza ARI distribution is independent of vaccination status and VE is constant across healthcare-seeking behaviors.
- Biased VE estimates can occur if studies include ARI cases during non-circulating periods or fail to adjust for calendar time.
- The design is less prone to misclassification and confounding by healthcare-seeking behavior than traditional methods.
Conclusions:
- The test-negative design offers advantages in reducing bias compared to traditional epidemiological study designs.
- Key assumptions include similar incidence of non-influenza respiratory infections and consistent VE across care-seeking strata.
- Careful consideration of these assumptions is necessary for reliable influenza VE estimation.

