Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 13, 2026

Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
The effect of left ventricular electrical delay on AV optimization for cardiac resynchronization therapy
Michael R Gold1, Yinghong Yu, Jagmeet P Singh
1Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina 29425-5920, USA. goldmr@musc.edu
Optimizing atrioventricular delay (AVO) for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is more effective in patients with longer QLV intervals, significantly improving remodeling response. This personalized approach enhances CRT outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- The effectiveness of atrioventricular optimization (AVO) in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) remains debated.
- Identifying patient subgroups that benefit from AVO is crucial for improving CRT outcomes.
- Pacing at sites of late electrical activation, measured by the QLV interval, has shown potential to improve CRT-induced remodeling.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if pacing at sites with prolonged left ventricular (LV) electrical delay enhances the efficacy of AVO.
- To determine the relationship between QLV interval duration and CRT response.
Main Methods:
- A substudy of the SMART-AV trial randomized 280 subjects to electrogram-based AVO (SmartDelay) or a nominal atrioventricular delay (120 ms).
- The QLV interval was measured from QRS onset to the LV electrogram peak.
- CRT response was defined as a >15% reduction in LV end-systolic volume at 6 months.
Main Results:
- Longer QLV intervals were significantly associated with a positive CRT response (P < .01).
- The benefit of AVO increased proportionally with QLV interval duration.
- Patients in the longest QLV quartile showed a more than 6-fold increase in remodeling response compared to nominal delays.
Conclusions:
- Baseline electrical dyssynchrony, indicated by the QLV interval, predicts CRT response.
- AVO significantly increases the likelihood of structural response in patients with long QLV intervals.
- Combining AVO with QLV-optimized LV lead placement may synergistically maximize CRT response.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
