Related Experiment Videos
Statistical assessment of population variability: a methodological approach
American Journal of Physical Anthropology
|May 1, 1990
Summary
This study introduces a statistical method to analyze cranial variability in skeletal samples. Plains Indian crania from Leavenworth showed significant differences between burial areas, unlike the Bad River 2 Phase sites.
Area of Science:
- Bioarchaeology
- Paleopathology
- Statistical Anthropology
Background:
- Assessing cranial variability is crucial for understanding population dynamics and social structures in past communities.
- Skeletal samples offer insights into group composition, health, and cultural practices.
Purpose of the Study:
- To implement and apply a multivariate statistical methodology for evaluating cranial variability in skeletal samples.
- To compare cranial variability within archaeological samples against a baseline of normal within-group variability.
Main Methods:
- Developed a statistical method comparing covariance matrices of skeletal samples.
- Applied the methodology to two Plains Indian craniometric datasets: Leavenworth site (39CO9) and Bad River 2 Phase sites.
Main Results:
- Substantial heterogeneity in cranial morphology was detected among crania from the Leavenworth site.
- Cranial heterogeneity at Leavenworth was partly explained by distinct burial areas, suggesting preserved social distinctions.
- No significant differentiation was found among sites within the Bad River 2 Phase, indicating a cohesive biological unit.
Conclusions:
- The multivariate statistical approach effectively identifies significant cranial heterogeneity within skeletal samples.
- Analysis of the Leavenworth site supports the interpretation of distinct social organization reflected in burial practices.
- The Bad River 2 Phase samples represent a biologically integrated population unit.