Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 13, 2026

Clinical Efficacy of Small Needle Knife Therapy on Stage I-II Frozen Shoulder
Published on: November 17, 2023
Identification of prognostic factors for the nonoperative treatment of stiff shoulder
Akira Ando1, Hiroyuki Sugaya, Yoshihiro Hagiwara
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tohoku University School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryomachi, Aobaku, Sendai, Japan.
Purpose:
This study evaluated prognostic factors for the nonoperative treatment of stiff shoulder.
Methods:
Between June 2005 and May 2010, 497 stiff shoulders treated at our institute were included in this study. Multivariable analysis for recovery with Cox proportional hazard model was performed. The chief determining variable was pathogenesis (idiopathic, diabetic, post-traumatic) and confounding variables were age (49 or less, 50-59, 60 and above), sex, onset to visit interval (three months or less, four months or more), and external rotation (under 0°, 0° or more) or forward flexion (less than 90°, 90° or more) or internal rotation on the first visit.
Results:
There were 356 idiopathic, 61 diabetic, and 80 post-traumatic stiff shoulders. Hazard ratio (HR) and 95 % confidence interval (CI) for recovery (lower HR means poor prognosis) was 0.54 (0.36-0.96) in the diabetic group (p = 0.007), and 0.92 (0.67-1.25) in the post-traumatic group (p = 0.58) compared with the idiopathic group. A positive correlation was observed in ages of 60 or over (HR 1.46, 95 % CI 0.86-1.65, p-value 0.02) and external rotation under 0° on the first visit (0.71, 0.53-0.96, 0.03). No correlations were observed in sex (p = 0.78) or onset to visit interval (p = 0.99). Similar results were obtained when forward flexion or internal rotation was used as a confounding variable.
Conclusions:
Diabetes mellitus and severely restricted joint motion on the first visit were poor prognostic factors and ages of 60 or over was a better prognostic factor.
