Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Close Relationships and Culture01:29

Close Relationships and Culture

Culture shapes how people approach attraction, choose partners, and build long-term relationships. While some preferences in mate selection appear consistent across cultures, such as men valuing physical attractiveness and women emphasizing financial resources, cultural contexts influence how these preferences are expressed and prioritized. Marriage extends beyond romantic ideals in many societies and is deeply embedded in social, economic, and religious frameworks.The Role of Culture in Mate...
Relationship Formation02:12

Relationship Formation

What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
Cross-Sectional Research01:50

Cross-Sectional Research

In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...
Social Exchange Theory02:06

Social Exchange Theory

We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
Social Exchange Theory01:26

Social Exchange Theory

As formulated by John Thibaut and Harold Kelley, Social Exchange Theory explains human relationships as economic-like exchanges that maximize rewards and minimize costs. This theory suggests that individuals engage in relationships to gain benefits and reduce burdens, similar to economic transactions. It has been widely applied to various types of relationships, including romantic, professional, and social interactions.Rewards and Costs in RelationshipsRelationship rewards include emotional...
Equivalent Couples01:28

Equivalent Couples

In mechanical engineering, the concept of equivalent couples plays a crucial role in understanding and analyzing various mechanical systems.
Two couples are considered to be equivalent if they produce the same rotational effect on a rigid body. In other words, the two couples have the same magnitude and act in the same direction, causing the same angular displacement or acceleration in the body.
For instance, consider two couples lying in the plane of the page, with one having a pair of equal...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Autonomic Dysfunction Is a Key Feature of Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome and Other Complex Disorders with Chronic Fatigue.

American journal of medicine open·2026
Same author

Cerebral Blood Flow in Orthostatic Intolerance.

Journal of the American Heart Association·2025
Same author

Angiotensin-(1-7) and Central Control of Cardiometabolic Outcomes: Implications for Obesity Hypertension.

International journal of molecular sciences·2025
Same author

Effects of short-term dietary nitrate supplementation on exercise and coronary blood flow responses in patients with peripheral artery disease.

Frontiers in nutrition·2024
Same author

Making Merit Work at the Entrance to the Engineering Workforce: Examining Women's Experiences and Variations by Race/Ethnicity.

Sex roles·2024
Same author

Creating Our Gendered Selves-College Experiences, Work and Family Plans, Gender Ideologies, and Desired Work Amenities Among STEM Graduates.

Social currents·2024
Same journal

Parental School-Involvement and Substance Use? A Novel Family-Based Prevention Strategy for Latino Youth.

Family relations·2026
Same journal

The influence of family weight talk on health and well-being from childhood to adulthood.

Family relations·2025
Same journal

Exploring father-adolescent closeness: A random forest approach.

Family relations·2025
Same journal

Partner strain and support associations with affective reactions to daily stressors.

Family relations·2025
Same journal

"I try not to let my kids see it": Mothering and emotion management.

Family relations·2025
Same journal

Young adult grandchildren's intergenerational and digital solidarity with grandparents and depressive symptoms during the pandemic.

Family relations·2025
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 13, 2026

Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design
07:40

Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design

Published on: May 31, 2021

Class Differences in Cohabitation Processes.

Sharon Sassler1, Amanda J Miller

  • 1Department of Policy Analysis & Management, Cornell University, 134 Martha Van Renssaeler Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853.

Family Relations
|March 19, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Working-class couples transition to cohabitation faster, often for practical reasons. Middle-class couples are more likely to be engaged, indicating diverging family outcomes by social class.

Keywords:
cohabitationengagementrelationship temposocial classunion formationyoung adult transitions

More Related Videos

Exploring Life History Choices: Using Temperature and Substrate Type as Interacting Factors for Blowfly Larval and Female Preferences
12:14

Exploring Life History Choices: Using Temperature and Substrate Type as Interacting Factors for Blowfly Larval and Female Preferences

Published on: November 17, 2023

Methods for Characterizing the Co-development of Biofilm and Habitat Heterogeneity
09:21

Methods for Characterizing the Co-development of Biofilm and Habitat Heterogeneity

Published on: March 11, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 13, 2026

Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design
07:40

Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design

Published on: May 31, 2021

Exploring Life History Choices: Using Temperature and Substrate Type as Interacting Factors for Blowfly Larval and Female Preferences
12:14

Exploring Life History Choices: Using Temperature and Substrate Type as Interacting Factors for Blowfly Larval and Female Preferences

Published on: November 17, 2023

Methods for Characterizing the Co-development of Biofilm and Habitat Heterogeneity
09:21

Methods for Characterizing the Co-development of Biofilm and Habitat Heterogeneity

Published on: March 11, 2015

Area of Science:

  • Sociology
  • Family Studies
  • Social Stratification

Background:

  • Limited research exists on social class variations in cohabitation formation and progression.
  • Cohabitation is increasingly common, yet its relationship with social class remains under-examined.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate social class differences in the process of forming and advancing cohabiting unions.
  • To explore the timing, motivations, and future plans of working-class and middle-class cohabiting couples.

Main Methods:

  • In-depth interviews were conducted with 122 working-class and middle-class cohabiting individuals.
  • Data analysis focused on the duration between dating and cohabitation, reasons for cohabitation, and engagement plans.

Main Results:

  • Working-class couples initiated cohabitation more rapidly than middle-class couples.
  • Practical reasons such as financial necessity, convenience, and housing needs were common motivations for cohabitation across social classes.
  • Contrary to popular belief, few couples viewed cohabitation as a trial marriage.
  • Middle-class cohabitors reported higher rates of engagement compared to their working-class counterparts.

Conclusions:

  • Cohabitation patterns and associated family outcomes appear to be diverging by social class.
  • Findings challenge common assumptions about cohabitation and highlight its role in reinforcing social stratification.
  • Further research is needed to understand the long-term implications of social class on cohabiting relationships.