Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Cause and Effect

Cause and Effect

While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?

Inductive Reasoning

Inductive Reasoning

Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:

Fundamental Attribution Error

Fundamental Attribution Error

According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is called the fundamental attribution...

Deductive Reasoning

Deductive Reasoning

Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the opposite direction as compared to inductive reasoning, which means that it uses a general principle or law to predict specific results. From those general principles, a scientist can deduce and predict the specific results that would be valid as long as the general principles are valid.
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...

Cognitive Learning

Cognitive Learning

Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Editorial: Understanding effective education: far transfer from a sociocultural and cognitive neural perspective.

Frontiers in psychology·2026

Same author

Habituation: It's not what you think it is.

Behavioural processes·2023

Same author

Still the same in human causal reasoning: Evidence for a uniform similarity parameter in generalisation and summation.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2020

Same author

On the representation of novel stimuli in patterning and irrelevant cue discriminations.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition·2018

Same author

A positive patterning advantage with complex but not simple patterning: a cue constellation approach.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2013

Same author

Effect of outcome valence on positive and negative patterning in human causal reasoning.

Learning & behavior·2010

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 13, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

Negative patterning and biconditional discriminations in human causal reasoning: a second look.

¹Rutgers University, Camden, NJ 08102, USA. bwhitlow@camden.rutgers.edu

The American Journal of Psychology

|March 20, 2013

Summary

Configural cue models predict that negative patterning discriminations are difficult. This study demonstrates negative patterning is as hard as biconditional discriminations, supporting configural cue models in causal reasoning tasks.

More Related Videos

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans

Published on: July 17, 2021

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 13, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans

Published on: July 17, 2021

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

Area of Science:

Cognitive psychology
Human causal reasoning
Learning theory

Background:

Previous research indicated patterning discriminations are easier than biconditional discriminations.
This finding aligned with the attentional buffer model but contradicted configural cue models.
A key prediction of configural cue theories, the positive patterning advantage, was not observed in prior studies.

Purpose of the Study:

To re-evaluate the role of configural cues in complex discrimination learning.
To investigate whether negative patterning discriminations are more difficult than biconditional discriminations.
To test the predictions of configural cue models using an appropriate experimental design.

Main Methods:

A human causal reasoning task was employed.
A specific experimental design was utilized to elicit a positive patterning advantage.
Participants learned negative patterning and biconditional discriminations.

Main Results:

Negative patterning discriminations were found to be at least as difficult to learn as biconditional discriminations.
The results demonstrated a positive patterning advantage with the chosen design.
The findings are consistent with the predictions of configural cue models.

Conclusions:

The study supports the validity of configural cue models in explaining complex discrimination learning.
The findings challenge previous conclusions that questioned the role of configural cues.
The chosen methodology is effective for evaluating the predictions of configural cue theories.