Context, causality, and appreciation
Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 13, 2026

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
Published on: April 18, 2017
1Department of Philosophy, University of Missouri-St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63121, USA. sross@umsl.edu
Abstract:
I applaud and elaborate on the contextualism at the heart of Bullot & Reber's (B&R's) theory, challenge two aspects of the appreciative structure they posit (the causal reasoning that allegedly underlies the design stance and the segregation of the component stages), suggest that expert and novice appreciators operate differently, and question the degree to which B&R's final theory is open to empirical investigation.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Framing Effects
Impact of Social Context on Individuals
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I
Factors Affecting Perception
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
Attribution Theory

