Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

D Contandriopoulos1, Raymond Hudon, Elisabeth Martin

  • 1Département d'administration de la santé et Groupe de recherche interdisciplinaire en santé à l'université de Montréal.

Canadian Public Administration : Administration Publique Du Canada
|March 20, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Right versus left pulmonary artery anastomosis of the right ventricle-to-pulmonary artery conduit in Norwood procedure: Comparable outcomes with longer Glenn operative time.

The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery·2026
Same author

CD19 CAR T Therapy Is Feasible in Patients with Pemphigus Vulgaris Treated Without Lymphodepletion in the RESET-PV Trial.

Blood·2026
Same author

Case study of resecabtagene autoleucel in a subject with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis treated in the RESET-SSc trial.

Molecular therapy. Advances·2026
Same author

The NMR Exchange Format (NEF): Specification and Applications.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Durability of Bioprosthetic and Mechanical Valves Implanted for Aortic Valve Replacement in Pediatric Patients.

Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions·2026
Same author

Successful transcatheter closure of a congenital aorto-right ventricular fistula after Norwood procedure.

JTCVS techniques·2026
Same journal

Executive decision-making during the COVID-19 emergency period.

Canadian public administration : Administration publique du Canada·2022
Same journal

Le déploiement de la surveillance épidémiologique automatisée du COVID-19 : une analyse comparée de la Corée du Sud et du Canada.

Canadian public administration : Administration publique du Canada·2022
Same journal

COVID-19, digitization and hybrid workspaces: A critical inflection point for public sector governance and workforce development.

Canadian public administration : Administration publique du Canada·2022
Same journal

Canada's legal preparedness against the COVID-19 Pandemic: A scoping review of federal laws and regulations.

Canadian public administration : Administration publique du Canada·2021
Same journal

Beyond COVID-19: Five commentaries on reimagining governance for future crises and resilience.

Canadian public administration : Administration publique du Canada·2020
Same journal

Parent child coalitions: innovative public-sector management and early childhood development in Manitoba.

Canadian public administration : Administration publique du Canada·2011
See all related articles

Bill 25 implementation in Quebec

Area of Science:

  • Health Policy
  • Political Science
  • Public Administration

Background:

  • Bill 25, Quebec's Act Respecting Local Health and Social Services Network Development Agencies, introduced a major reform.
  • Understanding the decision-making processes and stakeholder influence is crucial for health system reform.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the decision-making processes during the implementation of Bill 25.
  • To identify the strategies used by various groups to influence the reform.
  • To examine the role of lobbying and patronage in the implementation of Quebec's health reform.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of lobbying process models.
  • Examination of information gathered from re-transcribed interviews.
  • Qualitative analysis of stakeholder strategies.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Observed strategies align with characteristics of lobbying and patronage.
  • The implementation of Bill 25 was primarily a political process.
  • Technical arguments supporting the act were secondary to political considerations.

Conclusions:

  • The implementation of Bill 25 was driven by political dynamics rather than solely technical justifications.
  • Lobbying and patronage significantly influenced the reform's direction.
  • Understanding these political processes is key to analyzing health system reforms.