Factors influencing consistent device use in pediatric recipients of bilateral cochlear implants

Matthew B Fitzgerald1, Janet E Green, Yixin Fang

  • 1New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

Insights

Speech recognition scores with the second cochlear implant (CI-2) and the difference between the two implants (CI-1 vs. CI-2) are linked to inconsistent CI-2 use in children. Later implantation ages also correlate with CI-2 scores.

Area of Science:

  • Audiology
  • Pediatric Otolaryngology
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Sequential bilateral cochlear implantation (CI) is a common procedure for pediatric hearing loss.
  • Understanding factors influencing consistent use of both implants is crucial for optimizing auditory rehabilitation outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify demographic and performance variables associated with inconsistent use of the second cochlear implant (CI-2) in pediatric recipients.
  • To analyze the relationship between speech-perception scores and CI-2 usage patterns.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective chart review of pediatric sequential bilateral cochlear implant recipients.
  • Division of participants into two age groups: 5-9 years and 10-17 years.
  • Examination of associations between inconsistent CI-2 use, demographic data, and speech-perception scores.

Main Results:

  • In younger children (5-9 years), inconsistent CI-2 use correlated with CI-2 word-recognition scores and the difference between CI-1 and CI-2 scores.
  • In older children (10-17 years), these associations were not statistically significant due to a limited sample size.
  • Across all participants, CI-2 word-recognition scores were significantly correlated with implantation ages for both CI-1 and CI-2, and the interval between surgeries.

Conclusions:

  • Speech-recognition performance with CI-2 and the performance disparity between CI-1 and CI-2 are key factors in inconsistent CI-2 use among pediatric sequential bilateral cochlear implant recipients.
  • While later implantation ages may be associated with poorer performance, most children utilize both implants, demonstrating benefit even when implanted as adolescents.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos