Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 13, 2026

In vivo Evaluation of Mucociliary Clearance in Mice
Published on: December 18, 2020
Multisite comparison of mucociliary and cough clearance measures using standardized methods
William D Bennett1, Beth L Laube, Timothy Corcoran
1University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. William_Bennett@med.unc.edu
A new protocol for measuring mucociliary (MCC) and cough clearance (CC) showed no site differences. Females exhibited greater MCC/CC than males, suggesting potential sex-based variations in lung clearance mechanisms.
Area of Science:
- Pulmonary Physiology
- Respiratory Medicine
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- A standardized protocol was developed and validated across three major research institutions (UNC, JHU, Pitt) to measure mucociliary and cough clearance.
- This initiative aimed to establish a consistent methodology for assessing lung clearance mechanisms.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the reliability and reproducibility of a novel, standardized protocol for measuring mucociliary clearance (MCC) and cough clearance (CC).
- To identify potential factors, such as study site and gender, influencing MCC and CC measurements.
Main Methods:
- Fifty healthy adults inhaled a radiolabeled aerosol under controlled breathing conditions.
- Lung images were acquired using a gamma camera over 90 minutes, including post-cough measurements.
- Mucociliary and cough clearance were quantified using the area under the retention curve (AUC90), with central/peripheral aerosol distribution (C/P ratio) also assessed.
Main Results:
- Multivariate analysis revealed no significant differences in MCC/CC based on the study site.
- A statistically significant difference was observed in overall MCC/CC between genders, with females demonstrating higher clearance (AUC90=0.84 ± 0.11) compared to males (AUC90=0.90 ± 0.07, p=0.03).
- No significant gender-based differences were found for the C/P ratio or 24-hour residual lung activity.
Conclusions:
- The developed standardized protocol is suitable for multicenter clinical trials evaluating therapies to enhance MCC and CC.
- Findings suggest potential sex-based differences in lung clearance that warrant further investigation.
Related Concept Videos
Sputum Studies II: Culture and Sensitivity
Sputum culture and sensitivity is a medical procedure used to diagnose bacterial infections in the respiratory tract and select the most appropriate antibiotics for treatment. This process involves analyzing sputum samples of thick and opaque secretions produced in the lungs and airways. These samples are collected from patients and then sent to the laboratory for analysis.
The test can identify various pathogens responsible for respiratory infections, including Streptococcus,...
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Upper Respiratory Drugs: Antitussives, Expectorants, and Mucolytics
Antitussives include codeine, dextromethorphan (Robitussin), and benzonatate (Tessalon). Codeine and dextromethorphan exert their effects centrally by suppressing the cough reflex center in the medulla. Benzonatate operates peripherally within the respiratory tract by anesthetizing...
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-IV: Assessement and Diagnostic Studies
Medical History

